Brandon Nakashima vs Ernesto Escobedo — Charlottesville CH Round of 64

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Nakashima B.
6-3 7-6
Escobedo E.
Nakashima B.
6772
Escobedo E.
3640

Brandon Nakashima defeated Ernesto Escobedo 6-3 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH round of 64 on hard. Brandon Nakashima claimed a first win over Ernesto Escobedo in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-22Miami MastersQ2hardErnesto Escobedo6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Escobedo E.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
84
Break points won·Even
13
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Escobedo E.
Freshness·
90
—

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[10]
Schnur B.[1]
7-623-66-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Nakashima B.
6-16-1
Schnur B.[1]
Popko D.[16]
3-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Peliwo F.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
6-776-16-3
Popko D.[16]
Giron M.[5]
6-36-4
Schnur B.[1]
Rola B.[6]
6-27-64
R16
Daniel T.[4]
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Peliwo F.
Krueger M.[15]
6-12-66-1
Pospisil V.[10]
Oconnell C.[7]
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.[12]
7-656-3
Giron M.[5]
King D.[9]
6-43-67-65
Popko D.[16]
Kudla D.[3]
4-67-656-1
Schnur B.[1]
Bangoura S.
7-656-2
Rola B.[6]
Caruana L.
6-36-2
R32
Kudla D.[3]
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Pospisil V.[10]
Kavcic B.
7-656-4
Daniel T.[4]
Soderlund C.
7-636-2
Novikov D.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Peliwo F.
Karlovic I.[2]
6-17-5
Krueger M.[15]
Korda S.
3-66-36-1
Oconnell C.[7]
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Janvier M.[12]
Redlicki M.
6-26-4
Giron M.[5]
King K.
4-66-26-4
King D.[9]
Mmoh M.
6-34-1
Popko D.[16]
Wolf J.
4-66-46-3
Caruana L.
Ross G.
7-646-1
Bangoura S.
Vatutin A.[14]
5-76-26-4
Schnur B.[1]
Song E.
3-66-16-4
Rola B.[6]
Sarmiento R.
7-56-2
Nakashima B.
Polansky P.[8]
6-44-66-1
R64
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
7-637-62
Bangoura S.
Sock J.
6-30-0
Kavcic B.
Young D.
6-37-62
Ritschard A.
Glasspool L.
6-46-4
Caruana L.
Smith R.
6-47-5
Peliwo F.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Korda S.
Sels J.
6-43-66-1
Bellucci T.
Leshem E.
7-56-4
Soderlund C.
Peniston R.
7-54-66-2
Redlicki M.
Brouwer G.
7-656-4
Nakashima B.
Escobedo E.
6-37-64
King K.
Dunbar J.
6-36-4
Wolf J.
Nanda G.
6-06-1
Aragone J.
Cid R.
6-26-3
Sarmiento R.
Broady L.
6-46-2
Song E.
Redlicki M.
7-57-5