James Duckworth vs Tatsuma Ito — Playford CH Semi-final

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
James Duckworth
AUS2
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
JPN3
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Duckworth J.
7-5 2-0
Ito T.
Duckworth J.
72–
Ito T.
50–

James Duckworth advanced when Tatsuma Ito retired 7-5 2-0 in the Playford CH semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve advantage — Duckworth J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Duckworth J.Ito T.
25
Serve
—
13
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
24
Break points saved·Dominant
97
61
Break points won·Slight edge
4
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
72
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Ito T.
Freshness·
91
—

Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[2]
Uchiyama Y.[1]
7-626-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Ito T.[3]
7-52-0
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Polmans M.[4]
6-47-67
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Harris A.[6]
4-63-1
Ito T.[3]
Bolt A.[5]
7-56-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Clarke J.[7]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Saville L.
3-66-16-0
R16
Ito T.[3]
Mott B.
6-47-67
Duckworth J.[2]
Schoolkate T.
6-16-3
Clarke J.[7]
Heliovaara H.
6-46-3
Bolt A.[5]
Moriya H.[11]
6-46-0
Saville L.
Santillan A.[12]
3-67-626-2
Polmans M.[4]
Sekiguchi S.[14]
6-36-4
Harris A.[6]
Purcell M.[9]
4-67-56-2
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-36-4
R32
Bolt A.[5]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-37-63
Harris A.[6]
Sweeny D.
6-36-2
Sekiguchi S.[14]
Romios M.
6-36-1
Heliovaara H.
Mukund S.[10]
7-646-3
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Hardt N.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Crnokrak A.
6-37-5
Schoolkate T.
Vukic A.[13]
7-54-66-4
Clarke J.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-726-47-5
Ito T.[3]
Klein B.
6-46-4
Mott B.
Bourchier H.[16]
4-66-26-2
Moriya H.[11]
King E.
7-656-4
Saville L.
Tabilo A.[8]
3-66-46-1
Santillan A.[12]
Brymer G.
6-16-3
Polmans M.[4]
Grills J.
6-44-66-3
Purcell M.[9]
Zakharov A.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.[15]
Fanselow S.
7-656-2
R64
Klein B.
Kelly D.
4-0
Fancutt T.
Ma W.
6-46-1
Fanselow S.
Green C.
6-47-63
Romios M.
Barclay D.
1-66-37-65
Saville L.
Gerch L.
7-626-3
Heliovaara H.
Ibrahim J.
6-16-2
Crnokrak A.
Castelnuovo L.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Dellavedova M.
6-36-2
Mott B.
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-5
King E.
Puttergill C.
6-06-2
Niklas Salminen P.
Banes M.
6-36-2
Brymer G.
Mousley B.
6-26-1
Grills J.
Walkin B.
7-646-1
Sweeny D.
Bosnjak M.
6-37-67
Zakharov A.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-3
Hardt N.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-56-2