Brandon Nakashima vs Taro Daniel — Charlottesville CH Quarter-final

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Brandon Nakashima
USA
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1788Hard ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN4
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Nakashima B.
6-7 6-1 6-3
Daniel T.
Nakashima B.
67662
Daniel T.
79131

Brandon Nakashima defeated Taro Daniel 6-7 6-1 6-3 in the Charlottesville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nakashima B.Daniel T.
61
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Clear edge
13
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
18
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Daniel T.
Freshness·Dominant
90
59

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[10]
Schnur B.[1]
7-623-66-2
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Nakashima B.
6-16-1
Schnur B.[1]
Popko D.[16]
3-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[10]
Peliwo F.
6-16-2
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
6-776-16-3
Popko D.[16]
Giron M.[5]
6-36-4
Schnur B.[1]
Rola B.[6]
6-27-64
R16
Daniel T.[4]
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Peliwo F.
Krueger M.[15]
6-12-66-1
Pospisil V.[10]
Oconnell C.[7]
6-36-2
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.[12]
7-656-3
Giron M.[5]
King D.[9]
6-43-67-65
Popko D.[16]
Kudla D.[3]
4-67-656-1
Schnur B.[1]
Bangoura S.
7-656-2
Rola B.[6]
Caruana L.
6-36-2
R32
Kudla D.[3]
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Pospisil V.[10]
Kavcic B.
7-656-4
Daniel T.[4]
Soderlund C.
7-636-2
Novikov D.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Peliwo F.
Karlovic I.[2]
6-17-5
Krueger M.[15]
Korda S.
3-66-36-1
Oconnell C.[7]
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Janvier M.[12]
Redlicki M.
6-26-4
Giron M.[5]
King K.
4-66-26-4
King D.[9]
Mmoh M.
6-34-1
Popko D.[16]
Wolf J.
4-66-46-3
Caruana L.
Ross G.
7-646-1
Bangoura S.
Vatutin A.[14]
5-76-26-4
Schnur B.[1]
Song E.
3-66-16-4
Rola B.[6]
Sarmiento R.
7-56-2
Nakashima B.
Polansky P.[8]
6-44-66-1
R64
Mmoh M.
Rybakov A.
7-637-62
Bangoura S.
Sock J.
6-30-0
Kavcic B.
Young D.
6-37-62
Ritschard A.
Glasspool L.
6-46-4
Caruana L.
Smith R.
6-47-5
Peliwo F.
Hoyt E.
6-46-2
Korda S.
Sels J.
6-43-66-1
Bellucci T.
Leshem E.
7-56-4
Soderlund C.
Peniston R.
7-54-66-2
Redlicki M.
Brouwer G.
7-656-4
Nakashima B.
Escobedo E.
6-37-64
King K.
Dunbar J.
6-36-4
Wolf J.
Nanda G.
6-06-1
Aragone J.
Cid R.
6-26-3
Sarmiento R.
Broady L.
6-46-2
Song E.
Redlicki M.
7-57-5