Facundo Bagnis vs Pedro Sousa — Guayaquil CH Round of 16

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG11
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2019
clay
POR6
Pedro Sousa
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Bagnis F.
7-6 4-6 6-2
Sousa P.
Bagnis F.
77462
Sousa P.
63621

Facundo Bagnis defeated Pedro Sousa 7-6 4-6 6-2 in the Guayaquil CH round of 16 on clay. Facundo Bagnis extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-07-11BastadQ1clayPedro Sousa6-4 7-6(3)
2020-02-10Buenos AiresQ2clayFacundo Bagnis6-2 2-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sousa P.

Sousa P.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Sousa P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Sousa P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
54
46
Break points saved·Dominant
92
57
Break points won·Clear edge
35
48
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.
Varillas J.[12]
6-47-5
Dellien H.[1]
Coria F.[9]
6-36-737-60
Quarter-finals
Dellien H.[1]
Bagnis F.[11]
7-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Mayer L.[2]
4-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Cerundolo F.
7-647-5
Coria F.[9]
Hanfmann Y.[15]
4-67-56-4
R16
Mayer L.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.
Lorenzi P.[7]
6-37-65
Varillas J.[12]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Kovalik J.[13]
6-33-66-3
Coria F.[9]
Martin A.[5]
6-47-68
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Munar J.[3]
6-46-0
Bagnis F.[11]
Sousa P.[6]
7-634-66-2
Dellien H.[1]
Galan D.
6-25-77-5
R32
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Clezar G.
6-36-3
Kovalik J.[13]
Blanch U.
6-23-66-3
Quiroz R.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-757-56-2
Varillas J.[12]
Luz O.
7-602-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Monteiro T.[4]
7-667-65
Coria F.[9]
Lindell C.
6-747-50-0
Lorenzi P.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-56-4
Cerundolo F.
Gomez E.[10]
6-43-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-2
Mayer L.[2]
Collarini A.
6-12-66-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Echazu M.
6-34-67-5
Munar J.[3]
Gutierrez O.
6-46-2
Martin A.[5]
Zeballos F.
6-16-3
Sousa P.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.[11]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Galan D.
Domingues J.[16]
7-633-66-3
R64
Lindell C.
Mena F.
7-646-2
Collarini A.
Zederbauer A.
6-26-2
Galan D.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-56-2
Villanueva G.
March C.
6-46-3
Quiroz R.
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Luz O.
Ficovich J.
6-37-64
Blanch U.
Hidalgo D.
6-26-4
Clezar G.
Alvarez N.
6-26-3
Krstin P.
Matos R.
6-766-36-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Gonzalez A.
4-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Leite W.
6-46-1
Cerundolo F.
Chazal M.
7-646-2
Zeballos F.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-4
Gutierrez O.
Sakamoto P.
3-67-636-4
Etcheverry T.
Velotti A.
6-26-3