Max Purcell vs Dane Sweeny — Traralgon CH Round of 32

Traralgon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS9
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Purcell M.
7-5 6-2
Sweeny D.
Purcell M.
762
Sweeny D.
520

Max Purcell defeated Dane Sweeny 7-5 6-2 in the Traralgon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
69
Break points won·Even
10
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
68
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Purcell M.Sweeny D.
Freshness·
—
97

Sweeny D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[4]
Harris A.[6]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Harris A.[6]
Ito T.[2]
4-67-627-67
Polmans M.[4]
Moriya H.[12]
5-76-27-64
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[2]
Purcell M.[9]
7-56-1
Moriya H.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[1]
6-33-0
Harris A.[6]
Duckworth J.[3]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Tabilo A.[8]
6-17-5
R16
Harris A.[6]
Santillan A.[11]
3-67-54-1
Tabilo A.[8]
Mukund S.[10]
6-46-3
Moriya H.[12]
Clarke J.[7]
6-46-4
Ito T.[2]
Bourchier H.[16]
6-44-66-3
Purcell M.[9]
Mott B.
6-43-67-5
Duckworth J.[3]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-646-2
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Sekiguchi S.[14]
6-43-67-5
R32
Polmans M.[4]
King E.
6-37-5
Ito T.[2]
Mousley B.
6-46-3
Mott B.
Bolt A.[5]
7-657-64
Moriya H.[12]
Banes M.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Vukic A.[13]
6-13-66-3
Harris A.[6]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Clarke J.[7]
Green C.
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[3]
Heliovaara H.
6-46-2
Bourchier H.[16]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Mukund S.[10]
Fanselow S.
7-666-3
Sekiguchi S.[14]
Kelly D.
6-42-67-67
Purcell M.[9]
Sweeny D.
7-56-2
Watanuki Y.[15]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[11]
Hardt N.
6-16-2
Tabilo A.[8]
Saville L.
7-56-727-5
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Castelnuovo L.
6-46-2
R64
Saville L.
Crnokrak A.
6-26-4
Gerch L.
Orlov V.
6-20-0
Banes M.
Musialek A.
6-34-66-2
Kelly D.
Grills J.
6-35-77-67
King E.
Ibrahim J.
6-46-2
Mousley B.
Romios M.
6-27-64
Mott B.
Walkin B.
6-46-4
Heliovaara H.
Addison A.
6-36-0
Fancutt T.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-4
Sweeny D.
Zakharov A.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.
Niklas Salminen P.
7-625-77-65
Barrios Vera T.
Brymer G.
6-36-3
Green C.
Corbett J.
7-57-65
Fanselow S.
Klein B.
6-46-1
Hardt N.
Ma W.
6-47-5
Castelnuovo L.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-37-65