Daniel Masur vs Louis Wessels — Hamburg CH Round of 64

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
Louis Wessels
GER
Louis Wessels
#723ATP
27 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWLWW
Masur D.
6-2 6-4
Wessels L.
Masur D.
662
Wessels L.
240

Daniel Masur defeated Louis Wessels 6-2 6-4 in the Hamburg CH round of 64 on hard. Daniel Masur claimed a first win over Louis Wessels in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-17MunichQ1clayLouis Wessels6-3 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wessels L.

Wessels L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Serve advantage — Masur D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Wessels L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Wessels L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
36
Break points saved·Even
73
71
Break points won·Even
5
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
13
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Wessels L.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
86

Masur D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Wessels L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-35-76-1
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.
Ymer E.[2]
7-657-67
Van De Zandschulp B.
Caruso S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.[2]
Altmaier D.
4-66-37-67
Zapata Miralles B.
Celikbilek A.
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-27-5
Caruso S.[1]
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Gaio F.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.
Sels J.
6-47-68
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Troicki V.[9]
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Kamke T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mager G.[3]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[1]
Napolitano S.
7-52-66-2
Ymer E.[2]
Horansky F.[15]
7-57-5
R32
Napolitano S.
Martinez P.[13]
7-627-5
Caruso S.[1]
Masur D.
2-66-37-65
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Cressy M.
7-667-64
Ymer E.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-757-656-3
Sels J.
Haase R.[7]
6-747-646-3
Celikbilek A.
Robredo T.
6-24-66-0
Troicki V.[9]
Darcis S.
4-67-636-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Otte O.[8]
6-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.[14]
6-00-0
Horansky F.[15]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-636-1
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[10]
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Milojevic N.[11]
3-66-36-3
Gaio F.[6]
Moroni G.
6-16-2
Ilkel C.
Molleker R.[12]
7-632-66-1
Stebe C.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-26-3
Mager G.[3]
Choinski J.
6-46-4
R64
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Marcora R.
6-30-0
Napolitano S.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Basic M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Zuk K.
7-653-66-1
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Robredo T.
Molcan A.
7-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Torski O.
6-16-3
Choinski J.
Aubriot A.
6-36-0
Moroni G.
Kopriva V.
7-623-66-2
Ilkel C.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Ursu V.
6-17-5
Sels J.
Guttau N.
7-606-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Zverev M.
2-67-696-4