Orlando Luz vs Sumit Nagal — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Orlando Luz
BRA
Orlando Luz
#1054ATP
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND6
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Luz O.
6-1 6-4
Nagal S.
Luz O.
662
Nagal S.
140

Orlando Luz defeated Sumit Nagal 6-1 6-4 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Luz O.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Luz O.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Luz O.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Luz O.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
14
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
69
Break points won·Clear edge
12
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
21
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Luz O.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
92
96

Luz O.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Nagal S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[3]
Coria F.[7]
6-26-776-4
Semi-finals
Coria F.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
7-55-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Varillas J.[10]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[8]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Varillas J.[10]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-57-5
Coria F.[7]
Menezes J.[15]
6-43-66-3
Monteiro T.[3]
Ficovich J.
7-56-3
R16
Galan D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-37-5
Monteiro T.[3]
Hanfmann Y.[13]
1-66-37-5
Varillas J.[10]
Luz O.
7-637-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Matos R.
6-36-2
Menezes J.[15]
Mayer L.[2]
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[7]
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
6-26-1
Ficovich J.
Etcheverry T.
6-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Collarini A.[16]
6-16-766-1
R32
Menezes J.[15]
Krstin P.
4-66-13-0
Matos R.
Giustino L.[9]
6-35-2
Monteiro T.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-37-64
Ficovich J.
Sousa P.[5]
6-46-2
Galan D.
Mena F.[14]
6-16-4
Mayer L.[2]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-3
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
Sakamoto P.
4-66-37-63
Coria F.[7]
Cerundolo F.
7-56-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martin A.[4]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.
Domingues J.[12]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[13]
Gutierrez O.
6-36-3
Luz O.
Nagal S.[6]
6-16-4
Varillas J.[10]
Clezar G.
7-56-2
Collarini A.[16]
Quiroz R.
6-46-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-646-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Gonzalez A.
6-36-3
R64
Quiroz R.
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Hernandez J.
7-56-756-0
Matos R.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Gutierrez O.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Cervantes Huegun I.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-36-4
Krstin P.
Villanueva G.
6-36-0
Cerundolo F.
Blanch U.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Echazu M.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.
Velotti A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-3
Cuevas M.
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Clezar G.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Gonzalez A.
Iamachkine P.
5-77-646-2
Luz O.
Lindell C.
6-26-4
Galan D.
Hidalgo D.
6-33-67-67