Tatsuma Ito vs Max Purcell — Traralgon CH Quarter-final

Traralgon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN2
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
AUS9
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Ito T.
7-5 6-1
Purcell M.
Ito T.
762
Purcell M.
510

Tatsuma Ito defeated Max Purcell 7-5 6-1 in the Traralgon CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 32, but Tatsuma Ito had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 8 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
59
Break points saved·Dominant
61
92
Break points won·Even
9
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[4]
Harris A.[6]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Harris A.[6]
Ito T.[2]
4-67-627-67
Polmans M.[4]
Moriya H.[12]
5-76-27-64
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[2]
Purcell M.[9]
7-56-1
Moriya H.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[1]
6-33-0
Harris A.[6]
Duckworth J.[3]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Tabilo A.[8]
6-17-5
R16
Harris A.[6]
Santillan A.[11]
3-67-54-1
Tabilo A.[8]
Mukund S.[10]
6-46-3
Moriya H.[12]
Clarke J.[7]
6-46-4
Ito T.[2]
Bourchier H.[16]
6-44-66-3
Purcell M.[9]
Mott B.
6-43-67-5
Duckworth J.[3]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-646-2
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Sekiguchi S.[14]
6-43-67-5
R32
Polmans M.[4]
King E.
6-37-5
Ito T.[2]
Mousley B.
6-46-3
Mott B.
Bolt A.[5]
7-657-64
Moriya H.[12]
Banes M.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Vukic A.[13]
6-13-66-3
Harris A.[6]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Clarke J.[7]
Green C.
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[3]
Heliovaara H.
6-46-2
Bourchier H.[16]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Mukund S.[10]
Fanselow S.
7-666-3
Sekiguchi S.[14]
Kelly D.
6-42-67-67
Purcell M.[9]
Sweeny D.
7-56-2
Watanuki Y.[15]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[11]
Hardt N.
6-16-2
Tabilo A.[8]
Saville L.
7-56-727-5
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Castelnuovo L.
6-46-2
R64
Saville L.
Crnokrak A.
6-26-4
Gerch L.
Orlov V.
6-20-0
Banes M.
Musialek A.
6-34-66-2
Kelly D.
Grills J.
6-35-77-67
King E.
Ibrahim J.
6-46-2
Mousley B.
Romios M.
6-27-64
Mott B.
Walkin B.
6-46-4
Heliovaara H.
Addison A.
6-36-0
Fancutt T.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-4
Sweeny D.
Zakharov A.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.
Niklas Salminen P.
7-625-77-65
Barrios Vera T.
Brymer G.
6-36-3
Green C.
Corbett J.
7-57-65
Fanselow S.
Klein B.
6-46-1
Hardt N.
Ma W.
6-47-5
Castelnuovo L.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-37-65