Tatsuma Ito vs Bradley Mousley — Traralgon CH Round of 32

Traralgon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN2
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
AUS
Bradley Mousley
30 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Ito T.
6-4 6-3
Mousley B.
Ito T.
662
Mousley B.
430

Tatsuma Ito defeated Bradley Mousley 6-4 6-3 in the Traralgon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-09-24ShenzhenQ2hardTatsuma Ito6-2 2-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mousley B.

Mousley B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Ito T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Mousley B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
31%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Mousley B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
78
Break points won·Slight edge
9
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
43
38
Tiebreaks·Even
48
49

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[4]
Harris A.[6]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Harris A.[6]
Ito T.[2]
4-67-627-67
Polmans M.[4]
Moriya H.[12]
5-76-27-64
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[2]
Purcell M.[9]
7-56-1
Moriya H.[12]
Uchiyama Y.[1]
6-33-0
Harris A.[6]
Duckworth J.[3]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Tabilo A.[8]
6-17-5
R16
Harris A.[6]
Santillan A.[11]
3-67-54-1
Tabilo A.[8]
Mukund S.[10]
6-46-3
Moriya H.[12]
Clarke J.[7]
6-46-4
Ito T.[2]
Bourchier H.[16]
6-44-66-3
Purcell M.[9]
Mott B.
6-43-67-5
Duckworth J.[3]
Watanuki Y.[15]
6-36-3
Polmans M.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
7-646-2
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Sekiguchi S.[14]
6-43-67-5
R32
Polmans M.[4]
King E.
6-37-5
Ito T.[2]
Mousley B.
6-46-3
Mott B.
Bolt A.[5]
7-657-64
Moriya H.[12]
Banes M.
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Vukic A.[13]
6-13-66-3
Harris A.[6]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Clarke J.[7]
Green C.
6-26-4
Duckworth J.[3]
Heliovaara H.
6-46-2
Bourchier H.[16]
Fancutt T.
6-36-3
Mukund S.[10]
Fanselow S.
7-666-3
Sekiguchi S.[14]
Kelly D.
6-42-67-67
Purcell M.[9]
Sweeny D.
7-56-2
Watanuki Y.[15]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[11]
Hardt N.
6-16-2
Tabilo A.[8]
Saville L.
7-56-727-5
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Castelnuovo L.
6-46-2
R64
Saville L.
Crnokrak A.
6-26-4
Gerch L.
Orlov V.
6-20-0
Banes M.
Musialek A.
6-34-66-2
Kelly D.
Grills J.
6-35-77-67
King E.
Ibrahim J.
6-46-2
Mousley B.
Romios M.
6-27-64
Mott B.
Walkin B.
6-46-4
Heliovaara H.
Addison A.
6-36-0
Fancutt T.
Rosenkranz M.
7-56-4
Sweeny D.
Zakharov A.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.
Niklas Salminen P.
7-625-77-65
Barrios Vera T.
Brymer G.
6-36-3
Green C.
Corbett J.
7-57-65
Fanselow S.
Klein B.
6-46-1
Hardt N.
Ma W.
6-47-5
Castelnuovo L.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-37-65