Cem Ilkel vs Rudolf Molleker — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
Rudolf Molleker
GER12
Rudolf Molleker
#482ATP
1387ELO
1341Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Ilkel C.
7-6 2-6 6-1
Molleker R.
Ilkel C.
77262
Molleker R.
63611

Cem Ilkel defeated Rudolf Molleker 7-6 2-6 6-1 in the Hamburg CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Molleker R.

Molleker R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Molleker R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Molleker R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
69
Break points won·Slight edge
3
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Molleker R.
Freshness·
—
61

Molleker R.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 86 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-35-76-1
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.
Ymer E.[2]
7-657-67
Van De Zandschulp B.
Caruso S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.[2]
Altmaier D.
4-66-37-67
Zapata Miralles B.
Celikbilek A.
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-27-5
Caruso S.[1]
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Gaio F.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.
Sels J.
6-47-68
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Troicki V.[9]
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Kamke T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mager G.[3]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[1]
Napolitano S.
7-52-66-2
Ymer E.[2]
Horansky F.[15]
7-57-5
R32
Napolitano S.
Martinez P.[13]
7-627-5
Caruso S.[1]
Masur D.
2-66-37-65
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Cressy M.
7-667-64
Ymer E.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-757-656-3
Sels J.
Haase R.[7]
6-747-646-3
Celikbilek A.
Robredo T.
6-24-66-0
Troicki V.[9]
Darcis S.
4-67-636-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Otte O.[8]
6-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.[14]
6-00-0
Horansky F.[15]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-636-1
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[10]
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Milojevic N.[11]
3-66-36-3
Gaio F.[6]
Moroni G.
6-16-2
Ilkel C.
Molleker R.[12]
7-632-66-1
Stebe C.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-26-3
Mager G.[3]
Choinski J.
6-46-4
R64
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Marcora R.
6-30-0
Napolitano S.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Basic M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Zuk K.
7-653-66-1
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Robredo T.
Molcan A.
7-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Torski O.
6-16-3
Choinski J.
Aubriot A.
6-36-0
Moroni G.
Kopriva V.
7-623-66-2
Ilkel C.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Ursu V.
6-17-5
Sels J.
Guttau N.
7-606-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Zverev M.
2-67-696-4