Borna Gojo vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Liuzhou CH Round of 64

Liuzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Gojo B.
6-1 6-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Gojo B.
662
Van Rijthoven T.
130

Borna Gojo defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 6-1 6-3 in the Liuzhou CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
67%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Even
10.5
10.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
90
Break points won·Slight edge
10
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Van Rijthoven T.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Davidovich Fokina A.[2]
Istomin D.[9]
6-35-77-65
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[9]
Petrovic D.[7]
4-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[2]
Gojo B.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Jung J.[3]
7-646-1
Petrovic D.[7]
Li Z.[14]
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[2]
Shimizu Y.
5-76-36-1
Istomin D.[9]
Wu T.[15]
6-26-3
R16
Shimizu Y.
Kravchuk K.
5-76-42-0
Petrovic D.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
7-687-66
Wu T.[15]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
W/O
Davidovich Fokina A.[2]
Safiullin R.[13]
6-36-3
Jung J.[3]
Cui J.
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-647-5
Li Z.[14]
Jaziri M.[4]
6-46-2
Istomin D.[9]
Diez S.[5]
4-67-646-0
R32
Istomin D.[9]
Ochi M.
7-636-3
Jaziri M.[4]
He Y.
6-16-0
Eubanks C.[8]
Sabanov M.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[2]
Chung Y.
7-57-5
Safiullin R.[13]
Kalenichenko D.
7-56-4
Shimizu Y.
Safwat M.[10]
6-16-2
Kravchuk K.
Lopez Perez E.[6]
6-36-3
Jung J.[3]
Matsui T.
6-26-2
Cui J.
Lee D.[16]
6-26-4
Gojo B.
Bai Y.[11]
7-656-0
Petrovic D.[7]
Nam J.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
Noguchi R.
7-56-4
Li Z.[14]
Rawat S.
6-26-3
Diez S.[5]
Yevseyev D.
3-66-36-2
Wu T.[15]
Sultanov K.
6-16-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-26-1
R64
Shimizu Y.
Nedelko I.
6-01-1
Chung Y.
Niki T.
6-27-62
Barrientos N.
Sun F.
6-43-67-66
Kalenichenko D.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-2
Kravchuk K.
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Matsui T.
Wu H.
4-66-16-4
Cui J.
Tokuda R.
5-76-46-3
Gojo B.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-3
Sabanov M.
Li Y.
6-36-2
Nam J.
Uchida K.
6-37-64
Noguchi R.
Xia Z.
6-26-0
Rawat S.
Gao X.
6-46-4
He Y.
Reboul F.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Mo Y.
6-36-0
Ochi M.
Sabanov I.
6-26-2
Sultanov K.
Wang A.
6-26-0