Viktor Troicki vs Steve Darcis — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB9
Viktor Troicki
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
BEL
Steve Darcis
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWW
Troicki V.
4-6 7-6 6-3
Darcis S.
Troicki V.
47762
Darcis S.
66331

Viktor Troicki defeated Steve Darcis 4-6 7-6 6-3 in the Hamburg CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Steve Darcis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Viktor Troicki claimed a first win over Steve Darcis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-02-27Delray BeachR32hardSteve Darcis6-4 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Troicki V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Darcis S.

Darcis S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Troicki V.Darcis S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Troicki V.Darcis S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
62
69
Break points saved·Even
91
87
Break points won·Dominant
27
52
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-35-76-1
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.
Ymer E.[2]
7-657-67
Van De Zandschulp B.
Caruso S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.[2]
Altmaier D.
4-66-37-67
Zapata Miralles B.
Celikbilek A.
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-27-5
Caruso S.[1]
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Gaio F.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.
Sels J.
6-47-68
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Troicki V.[9]
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Kamke T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mager G.[3]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[1]
Napolitano S.
7-52-66-2
Ymer E.[2]
Horansky F.[15]
7-57-5
R32
Napolitano S.
Martinez P.[13]
7-627-5
Caruso S.[1]
Masur D.
2-66-37-65
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Cressy M.
7-667-64
Ymer E.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-757-656-3
Sels J.
Haase R.[7]
6-747-646-3
Celikbilek A.
Robredo T.
6-24-66-0
Troicki V.[9]
Darcis S.
4-67-636-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Otte O.[8]
6-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.[14]
6-00-0
Horansky F.[15]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-636-1
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[10]
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Milojevic N.[11]
3-66-36-3
Gaio F.[6]
Moroni G.
6-16-2
Ilkel C.
Molleker R.[12]
7-632-66-1
Stebe C.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-26-3
Mager G.[3]
Choinski J.
6-46-4
R64
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Marcora R.
6-30-0
Napolitano S.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Basic M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Zuk K.
7-653-66-1
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Robredo T.
Molcan A.
7-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Torski O.
6-16-3
Choinski J.
Aubriot A.
6-36-0
Moroni G.
Kopriva V.
7-623-66-2
Ilkel C.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Ursu V.
6-17-5
Sels J.
Guttau N.
7-606-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Zverev M.
2-67-696-4