Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Marco Cecchinato — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
clay
Marco Cecchinato
ITA1
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Seyboth Wild T.
7-6 6-4
Cecchinato M.
Seyboth Wild T.
7762
Cecchinato M.
6440

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Marco Cecchinato 7-6 6-4 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Cecchinato M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Serve advantage — Seyboth Wild T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Cecchinato M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Cecchinato M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
42
Break points saved·Even
93
89
Break points won·Slight edge
25
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Cecchinato M.
Freshness·Clear edge
88
64

Seyboth Wild T.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Cecchinato M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[3]
Coria F.[7]
6-26-776-4
Semi-finals
Coria F.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
7-55-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Varillas J.[10]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[8]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Varillas J.[10]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-57-5
Coria F.[7]
Menezes J.[15]
6-43-66-3
Monteiro T.[3]
Ficovich J.
7-56-3
R16
Galan D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-37-5
Monteiro T.[3]
Hanfmann Y.[13]
1-66-37-5
Varillas J.[10]
Luz O.
7-637-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Matos R.
6-36-2
Menezes J.[15]
Mayer L.[2]
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[7]
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
6-26-1
Ficovich J.
Etcheverry T.
6-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Collarini A.[16]
6-16-766-1
R32
Menezes J.[15]
Krstin P.
4-66-13-0
Matos R.
Giustino L.[9]
6-35-2
Monteiro T.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-37-64
Ficovich J.
Sousa P.[5]
6-46-2
Galan D.
Mena F.[14]
6-16-4
Mayer L.[2]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-3
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
Sakamoto P.
4-66-37-63
Coria F.[7]
Cerundolo F.
7-56-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martin A.[4]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.
Domingues J.[12]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[13]
Gutierrez O.
6-36-3
Luz O.
Nagal S.[6]
6-16-4
Varillas J.[10]
Clezar G.
7-56-2
Collarini A.[16]
Quiroz R.
6-46-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-646-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Gonzalez A.
6-36-3
R64
Quiroz R.
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Hernandez J.
7-56-756-0
Matos R.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Gutierrez O.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Cervantes Huegun I.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-36-4
Krstin P.
Villanueva G.
6-36-0
Cerundolo F.
Blanch U.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Echazu M.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.
Velotti A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-3
Cuevas M.
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Clezar G.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Gonzalez A.
Iamachkine P.
5-77-646-2
Luz O.
Lindell C.
6-26-4
Galan D.
Hidalgo D.
6-33-67-67