Daniel Elahi Galan vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Lima CH Round of 16

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
clay
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
Galan D.
6-3 7-5
Ugo Carabelli C.
Galan D.
672
Ugo Carabelli C.
350

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli 6-3 7-5 in the Lima CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58. Daniel Elahi Galan extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-15MunichR32clayDaniel Elahi Galan7-6(2) 6-4
2023-02-13Buenos AiresR32clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli7-6(7) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Ugo Carabelli C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Galan D.Ugo Carabelli C.
—
Serve
24
—
Return
36

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Ugo Carabelli C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Ugo Carabelli C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
78
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Dominant
21
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Galan D.Ugo Carabelli C.
Freshness·
—
98

Ugo Carabelli C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[3]
Coria F.[7]
6-26-776-4
Semi-finals
Coria F.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
7-55-76-0
Monteiro T.[3]
Varillas J.[10]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Bagnis F.[8]
Galan D.
6-46-2
Varillas J.[10]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-57-5
Coria F.[7]
Menezes J.[15]
6-43-66-3
Monteiro T.[3]
Ficovich J.
7-56-3
R16
Galan D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-37-5
Monteiro T.[3]
Hanfmann Y.[13]
1-66-37-5
Varillas J.[10]
Luz O.
7-637-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Matos R.
6-36-2
Menezes J.[15]
Mayer L.[2]
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[7]
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
6-26-1
Ficovich J.
Etcheverry T.
6-26-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Collarini A.[16]
6-16-766-1
R32
Menezes J.[15]
Krstin P.
4-66-13-0
Matos R.
Giustino L.[9]
6-35-2
Monteiro T.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-37-64
Ficovich J.
Sousa P.[5]
6-46-2
Galan D.
Mena F.[14]
6-16-4
Mayer L.[2]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-3
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
Sakamoto P.
4-66-37-63
Coria F.[7]
Cerundolo F.
7-56-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Martin A.[4]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.
Domingues J.[12]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[13]
Gutierrez O.
6-36-3
Luz O.
Nagal S.[6]
6-16-4
Varillas J.[10]
Clezar G.
7-56-2
Collarini A.[16]
Quiroz R.
6-46-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-646-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Gonzalez A.
6-36-3
R64
Quiroz R.
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Hernandez J.
7-56-756-0
Matos R.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Gutierrez O.
Alvarez N.
6-36-3
Cervantes Huegun I.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-36-4
Krstin P.
Villanueva G.
6-36-0
Cerundolo F.
Blanch U.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Echazu M.
6-26-2
Ficovich J.
Velotti A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-26-3
Cuevas M.
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Clezar G.
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Gonzalez A.
Iamachkine P.
5-77-646-2
Luz O.
Lindell C.
6-26-4
Galan D.
Hidalgo D.
6-33-67-67