Elias Ymer vs Ruben Bemelmans — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Elias Ymer
SWE2
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Ymer E.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Bemelmans R.
Ymer E.
657762
Bemelmans R.
776531

Elias Ymer defeated Ruben Bemelmans 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Hamburg CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ruben Bemelmans came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Elias Ymer claimed a first win over Ruben Bemelmans in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-01WimbledonQ1grassRuben Bemelmans6-3 6-7(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Bemelmans R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
16
Break points saved·Even
83
87
Break points won·Clear edge
23
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Bemelmans R.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-35-76-1
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.
Ymer E.[2]
7-657-67
Van De Zandschulp B.
Caruso S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.[2]
Altmaier D.
4-66-37-67
Zapata Miralles B.
Celikbilek A.
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-27-5
Caruso S.[1]
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Gaio F.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.
Sels J.
6-47-68
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Troicki V.[9]
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Kamke T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mager G.[3]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[1]
Napolitano S.
7-52-66-2
Ymer E.[2]
Horansky F.[15]
7-57-5
R32
Napolitano S.
Martinez P.[13]
7-627-5
Caruso S.[1]
Masur D.
2-66-37-65
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Cressy M.
7-667-64
Ymer E.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-757-656-3
Sels J.
Haase R.[7]
6-747-646-3
Celikbilek A.
Robredo T.
6-24-66-0
Troicki V.[9]
Darcis S.
4-67-636-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Otte O.[8]
6-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.[14]
6-00-0
Horansky F.[15]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-636-1
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[10]
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Milojevic N.[11]
3-66-36-3
Gaio F.[6]
Moroni G.
6-16-2
Ilkel C.
Molleker R.[12]
7-632-66-1
Stebe C.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-26-3
Mager G.[3]
Choinski J.
6-46-4
R64
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Marcora R.
6-30-0
Napolitano S.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Basic M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Zuk K.
7-653-66-1
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Robredo T.
Molcan A.
7-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Torski O.
6-16-3
Choinski J.
Aubriot A.
6-36-0
Moroni G.
Kopriva V.
7-623-66-2
Ilkel C.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Ursu V.
6-17-5
Sels J.
Guttau N.
7-606-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Zverev M.
2-67-696-4