Elias Ymer vs Daniel Altmaier — Hamburg CH Quarter-final

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Elias Ymer
SWE2
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2019
hard
Daniel Altmaier
GER
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1652Hard ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
Ymer E.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Altmaier D.
Ymer E.
46792
Altmaier D.
63671

Elias Ymer defeated Daniel Altmaier 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Hamburg CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Altmaier came in ranked #60. Elias Ymer extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-08Rome MastersQ2clayDaniel Altmaier7-6(5) 6-0
2022-07-11BastadR32clayElias Ymer6-4 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Altmaier D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ymer E.Altmaier D.
—
Serve
17
—
Return
4

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Altmaier D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Altmaier D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
96
Break points won·Slight edge
23
34
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Altmaier D.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Ymer E.: 19 days rest · Altmaier D.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-35-76-1
Semi-finals
Zapata Miralles B.
Ymer E.[2]
7-657-67
Van De Zandschulp B.
Caruso S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.[2]
Altmaier D.
4-66-37-67
Zapata Miralles B.
Celikbilek A.
7-676-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Stebe C.
6-27-5
Caruso S.[1]
Gaio F.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Gaio F.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.
Sels J.
6-47-68
Celikbilek A.
Stakhovsky S.[4]
7-666-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Troicki V.[9]
6-37-64
Stebe C.
Kamke T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mager G.[3]
6-36-2
Caruso S.[1]
Napolitano S.
7-52-66-2
Ymer E.[2]
Horansky F.[15]
7-57-5
R32
Napolitano S.
Martinez P.[13]
7-627-5
Caruso S.[1]
Masur D.
2-66-37-65
Stakhovsky S.[4]
Cressy M.
7-667-64
Ymer E.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-757-656-3
Sels J.
Haase R.[7]
6-747-646-3
Celikbilek A.
Robredo T.
6-24-66-0
Troicki V.[9]
Darcis S.
4-67-636-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Otte O.[8]
6-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.[14]
6-00-0
Horansky F.[15]
Pellegrino A.
4-67-636-1
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[10]
6-26-4
Kamke T.
Milojevic N.[11]
3-66-36-3
Gaio F.[6]
Moroni G.
6-16-2
Ilkel C.
Molleker R.[12]
7-632-66-1
Stebe C.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-26-3
Mager G.[3]
Choinski J.
6-46-4
R64
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-2
Stebe C.
Marcora R.
6-30-0
Napolitano S.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-4
Masur D.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Basic M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Zuk K.
7-653-66-1
Bemelmans R.
Smith J.
7-56-4
Pellegrino A.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Robredo T.
Molcan A.
7-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Torski O.
6-16-3
Choinski J.
Aubriot A.
6-36-0
Moroni G.
Kopriva V.
7-623-66-2
Ilkel C.
Haerteis J.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.
Ursu V.
6-17-5
Sels J.
Guttau N.
7-606-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Zverev M.
2-67-696-4