Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Enrique Lopez Perez — Ningbo CH Round of 16

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN4
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
ESP14
Enrique Lopez Perez
35 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Uchiyama Y.
7-6 6-3
Lopez Perez E.
Uchiyama Y.
7762
Lopez Perez E.
6530

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Enrique Lopez Perez 7-6 6-3 in the Ningbo CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Enrique Lopez Perez came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lopez Perez E.

Lopez Perez E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Lopez Perez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.9
8.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Lopez Perez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
76
Break points won·Slight edge
2
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
14
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
23
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Diez S.[11]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Klahn B.[2]
4-66-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Klahn B.[2]
Moriya H.
4-66-07-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Gojo B.
6-736-26-4
Diez S.[11]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-36-4
R16
Klahn B.[2]
Nam J.
7-657-63
Moriya H.
Santillan A.
6-756-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lopez Perez E.[14]
7-656-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ito T.[7]
6-47-65
Gojo B.
Zhang Z.
6-36-746-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Petrovic D.[16]
6-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Eubanks C.
7-617-5
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Yang T.
7-616-3
R32
Diez S.[11]
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Zhang Z.
Bolt A.[8]
6-46-4
Klahn B.[2]
Watanuki Y.
6-756-26-3
Nam J.
Harris A.[13]
6-37-5
Lopez Perez E.[14]
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Zhang Z.[12]
5-76-26-1
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-757-657-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu D.
6-26-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Jaziri M.[9]
7-686-4
Ito T.[7]
Uchida K.
3-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Polmans M.[10]
7-666-4
Petrovic D.[16]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Sun F.
6-766-26-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.[5]
7-57-61
Yang T.
Istomin D.[15]
3-66-36-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
R64
Eubanks C.
Vukic A.
7-56-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Cui J.
6-26-1
Wu D.
He Y.
7-626-3
Uchida K.
Reboul F.
2-67-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Rawat S.
6-44-66-3
Nam J.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-1
Moriya H.
Wu T.
1-66-36-4
Santillan A.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Barrientos N.
Oliveira G.
7-56-0
Zhang Z.
Tseng C.
6-44-66-4
Gojo B.
Li Y.
6-36-776-1
Chung Y.
Wang A.
1-66-26-1
Sun F.
Imai S.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Safwat M.
6-07-5
Yang T.
Gao X.
6-27-64
Purcell M.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2