Vasek Pospisil vs Christopher Oconnell — Las Vegas CH Semi-final

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
AUS10
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Pospisil V.
6-4 6-3
Oconnell C.
Pospisil V.
662
Oconnell C.
430

Vasek Pospisil defeated Christopher Oconnell 6-4 6-3 in the Las Vegas CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vasek Pospisil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-08DohaR32hardVasek Pospisil6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
—
Serve
20
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
49
Break points saved·Even
96
98
Break points won·Clear edge
7
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
62
38
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
72
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.
Duckworth J.[5]
7-56-7116-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-47-65
Pospisil V.
Oconnell C.[10]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.
Daniel T.[2]
6-46-1
Oconnell C.[10]
Giron M.[3]
7-673-67-66
Duckworth J.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-767-66
R16
Kozlov S.
Ritschard A.
5-76-46-1
Daniel T.[2]
Escobar G.
6-36-3
Pospisil V.
Krueger M.[11]
6-46-1
Giron M.[3]
Pervolarakis M.
6-07-64
Oconnell C.[10]
Peniston R.
6-35-76-2
Duckworth J.[5]
Popko D.[12]
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Gomez E.[6]
7-53-66-3
Johnson S.[1]
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
R32
Pervolarakis M.
Sock J.[13]
7-671-0
Ritschard A.
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-3
Johnson S.[1]
Aragone J.
W/O
Pospisil V.
Polansky P.[7]
6-16-2
Giron M.[3]
King K.
6-46-3
Popko D.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[11]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[2]
Bangoura S.
6-47-64
Escobar G.
Young D.[15]
7-697-5
Oconnell C.[10]
Mejia N.
6-36-2
Peniston R.
King D.[8]
6-756-46-3
Duckworth J.[5]
Smith R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Rola B.[4]
6-46-3
Gomez E.[6]
Glasspool L.
6-26-726-3
Escobedo E.
Kuhn N.[9]
7-683-66-1
Redlicki M.
Wolf J.[16]
6-37-5
R64
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-46-3
Glasspool L.
Redlicki M.
7-57-64
Pervolarakis M.
Kobelt A.
6-16-3
King K.
Altamirano C.
6-37-5
Aragone J.
Lokoli L.
7-657-5
Ritschard A.
Cozbinov A.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
King E.
6-757-646-4
Escobar G.
Korda S.
6-716-16-2
Broady L.
Cid R.
6-32-67-63
Mejia N.
Bellucci T.
4-66-16-3
Peniston R.
Draper J.
7-57-63
Smith R.
Arevalo M.
6-24-66-3
Quiroz R.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Novikov D.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Peliwo F.
6-22-66-2