Tatsuma Ito vs Kaichi Uchida — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN7
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Kaichi Uchida
JPN
Kaichi Uchida
#259ATP
1355ELO
1331Hard ELO
31 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ito T.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Uchida K.
Ito T.
3662
Uchida K.
6341

Tatsuma Ito defeated Kaichi Uchida 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Uchida K.

Uchida K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Uchida K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Uchida K.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
73
Break points won·Slight edge
9
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Uchida K.
Freshness·
—
95

Uchida K.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Diez S.[11]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Klahn B.[2]
4-66-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Klahn B.[2]
Moriya H.
4-66-07-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Gojo B.
6-736-26-4
Diez S.[11]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-36-4
R16
Klahn B.[2]
Nam J.
7-657-63
Moriya H.
Santillan A.
6-756-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lopez Perez E.[14]
7-656-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ito T.[7]
6-47-65
Gojo B.
Zhang Z.
6-36-746-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Petrovic D.[16]
6-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Eubanks C.
7-617-5
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Yang T.
7-616-3
R32
Diez S.[11]
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Zhang Z.
Bolt A.[8]
6-46-4
Klahn B.[2]
Watanuki Y.
6-756-26-3
Nam J.
Harris A.[13]
6-37-5
Lopez Perez E.[14]
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Zhang Z.[12]
5-76-26-1
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-757-657-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu D.
6-26-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Jaziri M.[9]
7-686-4
Ito T.[7]
Uchida K.
3-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Polmans M.[10]
7-666-4
Petrovic D.[16]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Sun F.
6-766-26-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.[5]
7-57-61
Yang T.
Istomin D.[15]
3-66-36-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
R64
Eubanks C.
Vukic A.
7-56-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Cui J.
6-26-1
Wu D.
He Y.
7-626-3
Uchida K.
Reboul F.
2-67-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Rawat S.
6-44-66-3
Nam J.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-1
Moriya H.
Wu T.
1-66-36-4
Santillan A.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Barrientos N.
Oliveira G.
7-56-0
Zhang Z.
Tseng C.
6-44-66-4
Gojo B.
Li Y.
6-36-776-1
Chung Y.
Wang A.
1-66-26-1
Sun F.
Imai S.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Safwat M.
6-07-5
Yang T.
Gao X.
6-27-64
Purcell M.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2