Uladzimir Ignatik vs Andrea Pellegrino — Ismaning CH Round of 64

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Andrea Pellegrino
ITA
Andrea Pellegrino
#138ATP
1674ELO
1422Hard ELO
$320kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWWWL
Ignatik U.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Pellegrino A.
Ignatik U.
646772
Pellegrino A.
774641

Uladzimir Ignatik defeated Andrea Pellegrino 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Ismaning CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andrea Pellegrino came in ranked #138.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ignatik U.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pellegrino A.

Pellegrino A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ignatik U.Pellegrino A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ignatik U.Pellegrino A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
53
67
Break points won·Dominant
6
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
2
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ignatik U.Pellegrino A.
Freshness·
—
86

Pellegrino A.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lacko L.[16]
Cressy M.[12]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[12]
Vesely J.[1]
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.[16]
Lenz J.
6-33-67-610
Quarter-finals
Lenz J.
Haerteis J.
6-14-2
Lacko L.[16]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-46-4
Cressy M.[12]
Masur D.[15]
6-36-4
Vesely J.[1]
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
7-646-2
R16
Haerteis J.
Kolar Z.
7-647-65
Masur D.[15]
Vanni L.
6-37-5
Vesely J.[1]
Napolitano S.[14]
6-796-46-3
Lenz J.
Lestienne C.[11]
7-616-4
Lacko L.[16]
Baldi F.[3]
6-16-4
Gabashvili T.
Huesler M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.[12]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-46-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
Halys Q.[7]
3-67-657-65
R32
Lenz J.
Bachinger M.[5]
5-3
Haerteis J.
Haase R.[2]
6-46-767-62
Kolar Z.
Lamasine T.[13]
6-47-5
Lestienne C.[11]
Altmaier D.
6-37-5
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
4-66-36-1
Lacko L.[16]
Sachko V.
7-52-66-3
Huesler M.
Nedovyesov A.[9]
6-46-4
Gabashvili T.
Ramanathan R.[6]
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Ward J.
7-626-3
Cressy M.[12]
Ignatik U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[15]
Sels J.
5-76-46-4
Vanni L.
Griekspoor T.[4]
6-47-64
Halys Q.[7]
Ilkel C.
6-796-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
Hassan B.
6-26-4
Napolitano S.[14]
Forejtek J.
7-56-1
Vesely J.[1]
Miedler L.
6-46-726-3
R64
Hassan B.
Arnaboldi A.
6-21-0
Blancaneaux G.
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Hoyt E.
7-626-4
Vanni L.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-664-66-4
Haerteis J.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Choinski J.
4-66-47-68
Lenz J.
Klein L.
6-46-3
Sachko V.
Marchenko I.
7-686-3
Huesler M.
Safranek V.
7-626-3
Gabashvili T.
Ehrat S.
6-37-62
Ward J.
Kotov P.
7-627-5
Ignatik U.
Pellegrino A.
6-746-47-64
Ilkel C.
Bonadio R.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Wessels L.
6-16-2
Miedler L.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-636-4