Quentin Halys vs Cem Ilkel — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA7
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Halys Q.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Ilkel C.
Halys Q.
696772
Ilkel C.
7114641

Quentin Halys defeated Cem Ilkel 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Quentin Halys extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ2hardQuentin Halys2-6 7-6(2) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Ilkel C.
39
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
32
Break points saved·Dominant
97
49
Break points won·Even
4
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
93
—

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lacko L.[16]
Cressy M.[12]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Cressy M.[12]
Vesely J.[1]
6-746-46-4
Lacko L.[16]
Lenz J.
6-33-67-610
Quarter-finals
Lenz J.
Haerteis J.
6-14-2
Lacko L.[16]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-46-4
Cressy M.[12]
Masur D.[15]
6-36-4
Vesely J.[1]
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
7-646-2
R16
Haerteis J.
Kolar Z.
7-647-65
Masur D.[15]
Vanni L.
6-37-5
Vesely J.[1]
Napolitano S.[14]
6-796-46-3
Lenz J.
Lestienne C.[11]
7-616-4
Lacko L.[16]
Baldi F.[3]
6-16-4
Gabashvili T.
Huesler M.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.[12]
Hanfmann Y.[8]
4-66-46-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
Halys Q.[7]
3-67-657-65
R32
Lenz J.
Bachinger M.[5]
5-3
Haerteis J.
Haase R.[2]
6-46-767-62
Kolar Z.
Lamasine T.[13]
6-47-5
Lestienne C.[11]
Altmaier D.
6-37-5
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
4-66-36-1
Lacko L.[16]
Sachko V.
7-52-66-3
Huesler M.
Nedovyesov A.[9]
6-46-4
Gabashvili T.
Ramanathan R.[6]
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Ward J.
7-626-3
Cressy M.[12]
Ignatik U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[15]
Sels J.
5-76-46-4
Vanni L.
Griekspoor T.[4]
6-47-64
Halys Q.[7]
Ilkel C.
6-796-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[10]
Hassan B.
6-26-4
Napolitano S.[14]
Forejtek J.
7-56-1
Vesely J.[1]
Miedler L.
6-46-726-3
R64
Hassan B.
Arnaboldi A.
6-21-0
Blancaneaux G.
Grenier H.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Hoyt E.
7-626-4
Vanni L.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-664-66-4
Haerteis J.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Choinski J.
4-66-47-68
Lenz J.
Klein L.
6-46-3
Sachko V.
Marchenko I.
7-686-3
Huesler M.
Safranek V.
7-626-3
Gabashvili T.
Ehrat S.
6-37-62
Ward J.
Kotov P.
7-627-5
Ignatik U.
Pellegrino A.
6-746-47-64
Ilkel C.
Bonadio R.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Wessels L.
6-16-2
Miedler L.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-636-4