Borna Gojo vs Marc Polmans — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS10
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Gojo B.
7-6 6-4
Polmans M.
Gojo B.
7862
Polmans M.
6640

Borna Gojo defeated Marc Polmans 7-6 6-4 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard. Borna Gojo extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-18MoscowQ1hardBorna Gojo7-6(5) 6-2
2021-06-28WimbledonQ1grassMarc Polmans6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
79
Break points won·Even
10
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Polmans M.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Polmans M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Diez S.[11]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Klahn B.[2]
4-66-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Klahn B.[2]
Moriya H.
4-66-07-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Gojo B.
6-736-26-4
Diez S.[11]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-36-4
R16
Klahn B.[2]
Nam J.
7-657-63
Moriya H.
Santillan A.
6-756-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lopez Perez E.[14]
7-656-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Ito T.[7]
6-47-65
Gojo B.
Zhang Z.
6-36-746-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Petrovic D.[16]
6-46-3
Diez S.[11]
Eubanks C.
7-617-5
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Yang T.
7-616-3
R32
Diez S.[11]
Yevseyev D.
6-27-5
Zhang Z.
Bolt A.[8]
6-46-4
Klahn B.[2]
Watanuki Y.
6-756-26-3
Nam J.
Harris A.[13]
6-37-5
Lopez Perez E.[14]
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Zhang Z.[12]
5-76-26-1
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-757-657-5
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu D.
6-26-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Jaziri M.[9]
7-686-4
Ito T.[7]
Uchida K.
3-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Polmans M.[10]
7-666-4
Petrovic D.[16]
Chung Y.
6-36-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Sun F.
6-766-26-4
Eubanks C.
Soeda G.[5]
7-57-61
Yang T.
Istomin D.[15]
3-66-36-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
R64
Eubanks C.
Vukic A.
7-56-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Cui J.
6-26-1
Wu D.
He Y.
7-626-3
Uchida K.
Reboul F.
2-67-56-3
Watanuki Y.
Rawat S.
6-44-66-3
Nam J.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-1
Moriya H.
Wu T.
1-66-36-4
Santillan A.
Li Z.
6-26-4
Barrientos N.
Oliveira G.
7-56-0
Zhang Z.
Tseng C.
6-44-66-4
Gojo B.
Li Y.
6-36-776-1
Chung Y.
Wang A.
1-66-26-1
Sun F.
Imai S.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Safwat M.
6-07-5
Yang T.
Gao X.
6-27-64
Purcell M.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2