Ryan Peniston vs Jack Draper — Las Vegas CH Round of 64

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Peniston R.
7-5 7-6
Draper J.
Peniston R.
7772
Draper J.
5630

Ryan Peniston defeated Jack Draper 7-5 7-6 in the Las Vegas CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ryan Peniston claimed a first win over Jack Draper in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-20EastbourneQFgrassJack Draper6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
8.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
88
Break points saved·Dominant
60
99
Break points won·Dominant
25
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Peniston R.Draper J.
Freshness·
—
100

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.
Duckworth J.[5]
7-56-7116-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-47-65
Pospisil V.
Oconnell C.[10]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.
Daniel T.[2]
6-46-1
Oconnell C.[10]
Giron M.[3]
7-673-67-66
Duckworth J.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-767-66
R16
Kozlov S.
Ritschard A.
5-76-46-1
Daniel T.[2]
Escobar G.
6-36-3
Pospisil V.
Krueger M.[11]
6-46-1
Giron M.[3]
Pervolarakis M.
6-07-64
Oconnell C.[10]
Peniston R.
6-35-76-2
Duckworth J.[5]
Popko D.[12]
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Gomez E.[6]
7-53-66-3
Johnson S.[1]
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
R32
Pervolarakis M.
Sock J.[13]
7-671-0
Ritschard A.
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-3
Johnson S.[1]
Aragone J.
W/O
Pospisil V.
Polansky P.[7]
6-16-2
Giron M.[3]
King K.
6-46-3
Popko D.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[11]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[2]
Bangoura S.
6-47-64
Escobar G.
Young D.[15]
7-697-5
Oconnell C.[10]
Mejia N.
6-36-2
Peniston R.
King D.[8]
6-756-46-3
Duckworth J.[5]
Smith R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Rola B.[4]
6-46-3
Gomez E.[6]
Glasspool L.
6-26-726-3
Escobedo E.
Kuhn N.[9]
7-683-66-1
Redlicki M.
Wolf J.[16]
6-37-5
R64
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-46-3
Glasspool L.
Redlicki M.
7-57-64
Pervolarakis M.
Kobelt A.
6-16-3
King K.
Altamirano C.
6-37-5
Aragone J.
Lokoli L.
7-657-5
Ritschard A.
Cozbinov A.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
King E.
6-757-646-4
Escobar G.
Korda S.
6-716-16-2
Broady L.
Cid R.
6-32-67-63
Mejia N.
Bellucci T.
4-66-16-3
Peniston R.
Draper J.
7-57-63
Smith R.
Arevalo M.
6-24-66-3
Quiroz R.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Novikov D.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Peliwo F.
6-22-66-2