Vasek Pospisil vs Taro Daniel — Las Vegas CH Quarter-final

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2019
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN2
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Pospisil V.
6-4 6-1
Daniel T.
Pospisil V.
662
Daniel T.
410

Vasek Pospisil defeated Taro Daniel 6-4 6-1 in the Las Vegas CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vasek Pospisil claimed a first win over Taro Daniel in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-22BaselQ2hardTaro Daniel7-6(7) 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
42
Break points saved·Even
96
93
Break points won·Dominant
7
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
18
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Pospisil V.Daniel T.
Freshness·
—
59

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.
Duckworth J.[5]
7-56-7116-3
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-47-65
Pospisil V.
Oconnell C.[10]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.
Daniel T.[2]
6-46-1
Oconnell C.[10]
Giron M.[3]
7-673-67-66
Duckworth J.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-26-3
Escobedo E.
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-767-66
R16
Kozlov S.
Ritschard A.
5-76-46-1
Daniel T.[2]
Escobar G.
6-36-3
Pospisil V.
Krueger M.[11]
6-46-1
Giron M.[3]
Pervolarakis M.
6-07-64
Oconnell C.[10]
Peniston R.
6-35-76-2
Duckworth J.[5]
Popko D.[12]
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Gomez E.[6]
7-53-66-3
Johnson S.[1]
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
R32
Pervolarakis M.
Sock J.[13]
7-671-0
Ritschard A.
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-3
Johnson S.[1]
Aragone J.
W/O
Pospisil V.
Polansky P.[7]
6-16-2
Giron M.[3]
King K.
6-46-3
Popko D.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-0
Krueger M.[11]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[2]
Bangoura S.
6-47-64
Escobar G.
Young D.[15]
7-697-5
Oconnell C.[10]
Mejia N.
6-36-2
Peniston R.
King D.[8]
6-756-46-3
Duckworth J.[5]
Smith R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Rola B.[4]
6-46-3
Gomez E.[6]
Glasspool L.
6-26-726-3
Escobedo E.
Kuhn N.[9]
7-683-66-1
Redlicki M.
Wolf J.[16]
6-37-5
R64
Kozlov S.
Song E.
6-46-3
Glasspool L.
Redlicki M.
7-57-64
Pervolarakis M.
Kobelt A.
6-16-3
King K.
Altamirano C.
6-37-5
Aragone J.
Lokoli L.
7-657-5
Ritschard A.
Cozbinov A.
7-56-4
Pospisil V.
Mmoh M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
King E.
6-757-646-4
Escobar G.
Korda S.
6-716-16-2
Broady L.
Cid R.
6-32-67-63
Mejia N.
Bellucci T.
4-66-16-3
Peniston R.
Draper J.
7-57-63
Smith R.
Arevalo M.
6-24-66-3
Quiroz R.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Novikov D.
6-36-4
Redlicki M.
Peliwo F.
6-22-66-2