Michael Mmoh vs Evan Zhu — Fairfield CH Round of 64

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
USA
Evan Zhu
#699ATP
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWW
Mmoh M.
6-4 6-3
Zhu E.
Mmoh M.
662
Zhu E.
430

Michael Mmoh defeated Evan Zhu 6-4 6-3 in the Fairfield CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zhu E.

Zhu E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Zhu E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Zhu E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
11
Break points saved·Dominant
91
31
Break points won·Dominant
31
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Zhu E.
Freshness·Clear edge
95
76

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Zhu E.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[12]
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[12]
King K.
6-37-62
Johnson S.[1]
Nakashima B.
3-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
7-657-65
Oconnell C.[12]
Draper J.
6-26-3
King K.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-610
Johnson S.[1]
King D.[9]
6-16-1
R16
Nakashima B.
Duckworth J.[6]
7-657-5
King D.[9]
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Polansky P.[8]
Kuhn N.[10]
6-46-4
Johnson S.[1]
King E.
6-36-2
Draper J.
Young D.[17]
6-37-61
King K.
Kudla D.[2]
6-26-3
Oconnell C.[12]
Gomez E.[7]
6-16-2
Daniel T.[4]
Cressy M.[16]
1-67-626-3
R32
King D.[9]
Korda S.
5-76-07-5
Oconnell C.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Young D.[17]
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-0
Kuhn N.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-42-66-0
Kudla D.[2]
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-4
King K.
Escobedo E.[15]
7-56-4
Polansky P.[8]
Ritschard A.
6-35-76-4
Draper J.
Sock J.[14]
3-67-626-3
Gomez E.[7]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[6]
Corwin F.
6-757-56-0
Nakashima B.
Novikov D.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[4]
Holt B.
6-16-4
Rola B.[5]
Velotti A.
6-16-4
King E.
Krueger M.[13]
7-55-77-64
Johnson S.[1]
Mmoh M.
7-646-4
Cressy M.[16]
Aragone J.
7-646-2
R64
Quiroz R.
Gerch L.
6-36-3
Aragone J.
Smith R.
7-646-4
Draper J.
Rybakov A.
6-12-67-5
Sarkissian A.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.
6-16-3
Svajda Z.
Redlicki M.
7-656-2
King K.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Pervolarakis M.
Verbeek S.
6-36-3
Ritschard A.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Leshem E.
2-66-16-4
Nakashima B.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-26-2
Velotti A.
Sinclair C.
6-767-646-4
Korda S.
Fanselow S.
6-47-64
King E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zhu E.
6-46-3