John Millman vs Guido Pella — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
AUS
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
ARG
Guido Pella
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWL
Millman J.
6-3 7-5
Pella G.
Millman J.
672
Pella G.
350

John Millman defeated Guido Pella 6-3 7-5 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. John Millman extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: John Millman closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-26MunichR16clayJohn Millman4-6 2-0 RET
2018-06-11StuttgartR32grassGuido Pella6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Millman J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pella G.

Pella G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Millman J.Pella G.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Millman J.Pella G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
64
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Dominant
64
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°COvercast
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 74%
Final
Medvedev D.[3]
Zverev A.[5]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Medvedev D.[3]
Tsitsipas S.[6]
7-657-5
Zverev A.[5]
Berrettini M.[11]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Djokovic N.[1]
3-67-56-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Fognini F.[10]
6-37-64
Berrettini M.[11]
Thiem D.[4]
7-686-4
Zverev A.[5]
Federer R.[2]
6-36-776-3
R16
Fognini F.[10]
Khachanov K.[7]
6-37-5
Djokovic N.[1]
Isner J.[16]
7-56-3
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Hurkacz H.
7-53-67-65
Berrettini M.[11]
Bautista Agut R.[8]
7-656-4
Thiem D.[4]
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-36-4
Zverev A.[5]
Rublev A.
6-07-64
Federer R.[2]
Goffin D.[13]
7-676-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Pospisil V.
7-677-5
R32
Zverev A.[5]
Chardy J.
7-6137-63
Djokovic N.[1]
Shapovalov D.
6-36-3
Isner J.[16]
Pouille L.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Monfils G.[9]
6-27-61
Pospisil V.
Sousa J.
6-37-5
Fognini F.[10]
Murray A.
7-642-67-62
Khachanov K.[7]
Fritz T.
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.[8]
Opelka R.
6-47-5
Berrettini M.[11]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Basilashvili N.[15]
Paire B.
6-41-66-1
Thiem D.[4]
Carreno Busta P.
7-636-3
Rublev A.
Millman J.
6-26-0
Federer R.[2]
Ramos A.
6-27-65
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.
7-637-63
Goffin D.[13]
Kukushkin M.
6-23-0
Medvedev D.[3]
Norrie C.
6-36-1
R64
Shapovalov D.
Tiafoe F.
6-46-2
Pouille L.
Li Z.
6-746-46-4
Monfils G.[9]
Sonego L.
7-56-716-3
Hurkacz H.
Zhang Z.
7-656-4
Norrie C.
Simon G.
7-56-2
Sousa J.
Krajinovic F.
2-66-47-65
Pospisil V.
Schwartzman D.[14]
7-626-2
Fognini F.[10]
Querrey S.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Londero J.
2-66-26-3
Garin C.
Cuevas P.
6-16-4
Berrettini M.[11]
Struff J.
6-26-1
Basilashvili N.[15]
Albot R.
4-66-16-3
Paire B.
Cecchinato M.
6-27-5
Chardy J.
Edmund K.
6-47-63
Goffin D.[13]
Gasquet R.
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.
Kecmanovic M.
7-646-4
Ramos A.
Cilic M.
6-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Bublik A.
7-654-0
Rublev A.
Coric B.[12]
6-47-64
Millman J.
Pella G.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Zhang Z.
6-32-66-4
Isner J.[16]
De Minaur A.
7-616-4
Fritz T.
Verdasco F.
7-626-756-4
Opelka R.
Lajovic D.
6-36-4