Evan King vs Strong Kirchheimer — Fairfield CH Round of 64

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
USA
Evan King
34 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
Strong Kirchheimer
USA
Strong Kirchheimer
#660ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLL
King E.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Kirchheimer S.
King E.
65662
Kirchheimer S.
77341

Evan King defeated Strong Kirchheimer 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Fairfield CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Evan King came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
King E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Kirchheimer S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs King E.

Serve advantage — Kirchheimer S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
King E.Kirchheimer S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
King E.Kirchheimer S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
6
Break points saved·Dominant
37
63
Break points won·Slight edge
5
0
Deciding sets·Slight edge
4
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
King E.Kirchheimer S.
Freshness·
—
78

Kirchheimer S.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[12]
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[12]
King K.
6-37-62
Johnson S.[1]
Nakashima B.
3-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
7-657-65
Oconnell C.[12]
Draper J.
6-26-3
King K.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-610
Johnson S.[1]
King D.[9]
6-16-1
R16
Nakashima B.
Duckworth J.[6]
7-657-5
King D.[9]
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Polansky P.[8]
Kuhn N.[10]
6-46-4
Johnson S.[1]
King E.
6-36-2
Draper J.
Young D.[17]
6-37-61
King K.
Kudla D.[2]
6-26-3
Oconnell C.[12]
Gomez E.[7]
6-16-2
Daniel T.[4]
Cressy M.[16]
1-67-626-3
R32
King D.[9]
Korda S.
5-76-07-5
Oconnell C.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Young D.[17]
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-0
Kuhn N.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-42-66-0
Kudla D.[2]
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-4
King K.
Escobedo E.[15]
7-56-4
Polansky P.[8]
Ritschard A.
6-35-76-4
Draper J.
Sock J.[14]
3-67-626-3
Gomez E.[7]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[6]
Corwin F.
6-757-56-0
Nakashima B.
Novikov D.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[4]
Holt B.
6-16-4
Rola B.[5]
Velotti A.
6-16-4
King E.
Krueger M.[13]
7-55-77-64
Johnson S.[1]
Mmoh M.
7-646-4
Cressy M.[16]
Aragone J.
7-646-2
R64
Quiroz R.
Gerch L.
6-36-3
Aragone J.
Smith R.
7-646-4
Draper J.
Rybakov A.
6-12-67-5
Sarkissian A.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.
6-16-3
Svajda Z.
Redlicki M.
7-656-2
King K.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Pervolarakis M.
Verbeek S.
6-36-3
Ritschard A.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Leshem E.
2-66-16-4
Nakashima B.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-26-2
Velotti A.
Sinclair C.
6-767-646-4
Korda S.
Fanselow S.
6-47-64
King E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zhu E.
6-46-3