Christopher Oconnell vs Steve Johnson — Fairfield CH Final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Final
AUS12
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
USA1
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
Oconnell C.
6-4 6-4
Johnson S.
Oconnell C.
662
Johnson S.
440

Christopher Oconnell defeated Steve Johnson 6-4 6-4 in the Fairfield CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Johnson S.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Johnson S.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Johnson S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.1
8.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Johnson S.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
52
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[12]
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[12]
King K.
6-37-62
Johnson S.[1]
Nakashima B.
3-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
7-657-65
Oconnell C.[12]
Draper J.
6-26-3
King K.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-610
Johnson S.[1]
King D.[9]
6-16-1
R16
Nakashima B.
Duckworth J.[6]
7-657-5
King D.[9]
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Polansky P.[8]
Kuhn N.[10]
6-46-4
Johnson S.[1]
King E.
6-36-2
Draper J.
Young D.[17]
6-37-61
King K.
Kudla D.[2]
6-26-3
Oconnell C.[12]
Gomez E.[7]
6-16-2
Daniel T.[4]
Cressy M.[16]
1-67-626-3
R32
King D.[9]
Korda S.
5-76-07-5
Oconnell C.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Young D.[17]
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-0
Kuhn N.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-42-66-0
Kudla D.[2]
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-4
King K.
Escobedo E.[15]
7-56-4
Polansky P.[8]
Ritschard A.
6-35-76-4
Draper J.
Sock J.[14]
3-67-626-3
Gomez E.[7]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[6]
Corwin F.
6-757-56-0
Nakashima B.
Novikov D.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[4]
Holt B.
6-16-4
Rola B.[5]
Velotti A.
6-16-4
King E.
Krueger M.[13]
7-55-77-64
Johnson S.[1]
Mmoh M.
7-646-4
Cressy M.[16]
Aragone J.
7-646-2
R64
Quiroz R.
Gerch L.
6-36-3
Aragone J.
Smith R.
7-646-4
Draper J.
Rybakov A.
6-12-67-5
Sarkissian A.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.
6-16-3
Svajda Z.
Redlicki M.
7-656-2
King K.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Pervolarakis M.
Verbeek S.
6-36-3
Ritschard A.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Leshem E.
2-66-16-4
Nakashima B.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-26-2
Velotti A.
Sinclair C.
6-767-646-4
Korda S.
Fanselow S.
6-47-64
King E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zhu E.
6-46-3