Christopher Oconnell vs Emilio Gomez — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS12
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
ECU7
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Oconnell C.
6-1 6-2
Gomez E.
Oconnell C.
662
Gomez E.
120

Christopher Oconnell defeated Emilio Gomez 6-1 6-2 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Gomez E.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
77
Break points won·Even
22
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.[12]
Johnson S.[1]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.[12]
King K.
6-37-62
Johnson S.[1]
Nakashima B.
3-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.
Daniel T.[4]
7-657-65
Oconnell C.[12]
Draper J.
6-26-3
King K.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-610
Johnson S.[1]
King D.[9]
6-16-1
R16
Nakashima B.
Duckworth J.[6]
7-657-5
King D.[9]
Rola B.[5]
6-46-2
Polansky P.[8]
Kuhn N.[10]
6-46-4
Johnson S.[1]
King E.
6-36-2
Draper J.
Young D.[17]
6-37-61
King K.
Kudla D.[2]
6-26-3
Oconnell C.[12]
Gomez E.[7]
6-16-2
Daniel T.[4]
Cressy M.[16]
1-67-626-3
R32
King D.[9]
Korda S.
5-76-07-5
Oconnell C.[12]
Quiroz R.
6-36-4
Young D.[17]
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-0
Kuhn N.[10]
Pervolarakis M.
6-42-66-0
Kudla D.[2]
Svajda Z.
6-13-66-4
King K.
Escobedo E.[15]
7-56-4
Polansky P.[8]
Ritschard A.
6-35-76-4
Draper J.
Sock J.[14]
3-67-626-3
Gomez E.[7]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[6]
Corwin F.
6-757-56-0
Nakashima B.
Novikov D.
6-26-4
Daniel T.[4]
Holt B.
6-16-4
Rola B.[5]
Velotti A.
6-16-4
King E.
Krueger M.[13]
7-55-77-64
Johnson S.[1]
Mmoh M.
7-646-4
Cressy M.[16]
Aragone J.
7-646-2
R64
Quiroz R.
Gerch L.
6-36-3
Aragone J.
Smith R.
7-646-4
Draper J.
Rybakov A.
6-12-67-5
Sarkissian A.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Corwin F.
Peliwo F.
6-16-3
Svajda Z.
Redlicki M.
7-656-2
King K.
Celikbilek A.
6-46-3
Pervolarakis M.
Verbeek S.
6-36-3
Ritschard A.
Bangoura S.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Leshem E.
2-66-16-4
Nakashima B.
Blanch U.
6-26-4
Holt B.
Altamirano C.
6-26-2
Velotti A.
Sinclair C.
6-767-646-4
Korda S.
Fanselow S.
6-47-64
King E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zhu E.
6-46-3