Andrey Rublev vs Borna Coric — Shanghai Masters Round of 64
Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
Rublev A.6-4 7-6
Coric B.
Rublev A.
6772
Coric B.
4640
Andrey Rublev defeated Borna Coric 6-4 7-6 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's round of 64. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 4–0.
Key context
- Match story: Andrey Rublev edged Borna Coric in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
3–0| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-12 | St Petersburg | F | hard | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(5) 6-4 |
| 2018-01-01 | Doha | QF | hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2017-11-06 | NextGen Finals | SF | hard | Andrey Rublev | 4-1 4-3(6) 4-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on hard
Rublev A.Coric B.
55
Serve
—
49
Return
—
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°COvercast
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 74%
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Djokovic N.[1]
3-67-56-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Fognini F.[10]
6-37-64
Berrettini M.[11]
Thiem D.[4]
7-686-4
Zverev A.[5]
Federer R.[2]
6-36-776-3
R16
Fognini F.[10]
Khachanov K.[7]
6-37-5
Djokovic N.[1]
Isner J.[16]
7-56-3
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Hurkacz H.
7-53-67-65
Berrettini M.[11]
Bautista Agut R.[8]
7-656-4
Thiem D.[4]
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-36-4
Zverev A.[5]
Rublev A.
6-07-64
Federer R.[2]
Goffin D.[13]
7-676-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Pospisil V.
7-677-5
R32
Zverev A.[5]
Chardy J.
7-6137-63
Djokovic N.[1]
Shapovalov D.
6-36-3
Isner J.[16]
Pouille L.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Monfils G.[9]
6-27-61
Pospisil V.
Sousa J.
6-37-5
Fognini F.[10]
Murray A.
7-642-67-62
Khachanov K.[7]
Fritz T.
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.[8]
Opelka R.
6-47-5
Berrettini M.[11]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Basilashvili N.[15]
Paire B.
6-41-66-1
Thiem D.[4]
Carreno Busta P.
7-636-3
Rublev A.
Millman J.
6-26-0
Federer R.[2]
Ramos A.
6-27-65
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.
7-637-63
Goffin D.[13]
Kukushkin M.
6-23-0
Medvedev D.[3]
Norrie C.
6-36-1
R64
Shapovalov D.
Tiafoe F.
6-46-2
Pouille L.
Li Z.
6-746-46-4
Monfils G.[9]
Sonego L.
7-56-716-3
Hurkacz H.
Zhang Z.
7-656-4
Norrie C.
Simon G.
7-56-2
Sousa J.
Krajinovic F.
2-66-47-65
Pospisil V.
Schwartzman D.[14]
7-626-2
Fognini F.[10]
Querrey S.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Londero J.
2-66-26-3
Garin C.
Cuevas P.
6-16-4
Berrettini M.[11]
Struff J.
6-26-1
Basilashvili N.[15]
Albot R.
4-66-16-3
Paire B.
Cecchinato M.
6-27-5
Chardy J.
Edmund K.
6-47-63
Goffin D.[13]
Gasquet R.
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.
Kecmanovic M.
7-646-4
Ramos A.
Cilic M.
6-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Bublik A.
7-654-0
Rublev A.
Coric B.[12]
6-47-64
Millman J.
Pella G.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Zhang Z.
6-32-66-4
Isner J.[16]
De Minaur A.
7-616-4
Fritz T.
Verdasco F.
7-626-756-4
Opelka R.
Lajovic D.
6-36-4