Jeremy Chardy vs Kyle Edmund — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
FRA
Jeremy Chardy
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
hard
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
Chardy J.
6-4 7-6
Edmund K.
Chardy J.
6772
Edmund K.
4630

Jeremy Chardy defeated Kyle Edmund 6-4 7-6 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kyle Edmund came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Jeremy Chardy narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-05-27Roland GarrosR128clayKyle Edmund7-6(1) 5-7 6-4 4-6 7-5
2017-04-24BarcelonaR64clayKyle Edmund6-3 6-4
2017-04-07Davis Cup WG QF: FRA vs GBRRRclayJeremy Chardy6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Chardy J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Edmund K.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Chardy J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chardy J.Edmund K.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.4
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chardy J.Edmund K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
92
Break points won·Slight edge
28
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
25
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°COvercast
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 74%
Final
Medvedev D.[3]
Zverev A.[5]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Medvedev D.[3]
Tsitsipas S.[6]
7-657-5
Zverev A.[5]
Berrettini M.[11]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Djokovic N.[1]
3-67-56-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Fognini F.[10]
6-37-64
Berrettini M.[11]
Thiem D.[4]
7-686-4
Zverev A.[5]
Federer R.[2]
6-36-776-3
R16
Fognini F.[10]
Khachanov K.[7]
6-37-5
Djokovic N.[1]
Isner J.[16]
7-56-3
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Hurkacz H.
7-53-67-65
Berrettini M.[11]
Bautista Agut R.[8]
7-656-4
Thiem D.[4]
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-36-4
Zverev A.[5]
Rublev A.
6-07-64
Federer R.[2]
Goffin D.[13]
7-676-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Pospisil V.
7-677-5
R32
Zverev A.[5]
Chardy J.
7-6137-63
Djokovic N.[1]
Shapovalov D.
6-36-3
Isner J.[16]
Pouille L.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Monfils G.[9]
6-27-61
Pospisil V.
Sousa J.
6-37-5
Fognini F.[10]
Murray A.
7-642-67-62
Khachanov K.[7]
Fritz T.
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.[8]
Opelka R.
6-47-5
Berrettini M.[11]
Garin C.
6-36-3
Basilashvili N.[15]
Paire B.
6-41-66-1
Thiem D.[4]
Carreno Busta P.
7-636-3
Rublev A.
Millman J.
6-26-0
Federer R.[2]
Ramos A.
6-27-65
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Auger Aliassime F.
7-637-63
Goffin D.[13]
Kukushkin M.
6-23-0
Medvedev D.[3]
Norrie C.
6-36-1
R64
Shapovalov D.
Tiafoe F.
6-46-2
Pouille L.
Li Z.
6-746-46-4
Monfils G.[9]
Sonego L.
7-56-716-3
Hurkacz H.
Zhang Z.
7-656-4
Norrie C.
Simon G.
7-56-2
Sousa J.
Krajinovic F.
2-66-47-65
Pospisil V.
Schwartzman D.[14]
7-626-2
Fognini F.[10]
Querrey S.
6-46-2
Murray A.
Londero J.
2-66-26-3
Garin C.
Cuevas P.
6-16-4
Berrettini M.[11]
Struff J.
6-26-1
Basilashvili N.[15]
Albot R.
4-66-16-3
Paire B.
Cecchinato M.
6-27-5
Chardy J.
Edmund K.
6-47-63
Goffin D.[13]
Gasquet R.
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.
Kecmanovic M.
7-646-4
Ramos A.
Cilic M.
6-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Bublik A.
7-654-0
Rublev A.
Coric B.[12]
6-47-64
Millman J.
Pella G.
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Zhang Z.
6-32-66-4
Isner J.[16]
De Minaur A.
7-616-4
Fritz T.
Verdasco F.
7-626-756-4
Opelka R.
Lajovic D.
6-36-4