Facundo Bagnis vs Federico Gaio — Santo Domingo CH Round of 16

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG7
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2019
clay
ITA9
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Bagnis F.
7-6 6-2
Gaio F.
Bagnis F.
7762
Gaio F.
6420

Facundo Bagnis defeated Federico Gaio 7-6 6-2 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Facundo Bagnis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-03CordobaQ2clayFacundo Bagnis6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
76
Break points won·Dominant
35
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
40
Tiebreaks·Even
3
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Varillas J.
Coria F.[8]
6-32-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[8]
Dellien H.[2]
6-36-1
Varillas J.
Monteiro T.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Coria F.[8]
Clezar G.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[2]
Giannessi A.[11]
6-36-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Tabilo A.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Bagnis F.[7]
6-36-3
R16
Clezar G.
Menezes J.
6-36-2
Giannessi A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
3-66-6
Varillas J.
Delbonis F.[1]
3-66-36-4
Dellien H.[2]
Collarini A.[15]
6-46-4
Coria F.[8]
Zeballos F.
7-626-3
Tabilo A.
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
3-66-06-3
Monteiro T.[4]
Gutierrez O.
6-37-5
Bagnis F.[7]
Gaio F.[9]
7-646-2
R32
Tabilo A.
Nagal S.[6]
6-756-02-0
Gaio F.[9]
Olivo R.
6-41-0
Dellien H.[2]
Villanueva G.
6-26-3
Vilella Martinez M.[12]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Collarini A.[15]
Alvarez N.
6-746-46-1
Giannessi A.[11]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-16-4
Andreozzi G.[5]
Luz O.
6-46-3
Clezar G.
Mayer L.[3]
6-31-67-65
Menezes J.
Mena F.[13]
6-24-66-0
Zeballos F.
Martinez P.[10]
1-67-56-4
Coria F.[8]
Hernandez J.
6-46-1
Gutierrez O.
Krstin P.[14]
7-56-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Estrella V.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.[7]
Hidalgo D.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Galan D.[16]
6-26-3
Delbonis F.[1]
Moroni G.
3-67-647-5
R64
Villanueva G.
Molteni A.
4-66-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Olivares J.
6-36-4
Hamou M.
Jahn J.
2-66-42-0
Gutierrez O.
Elias G.
4-66-34-4
Varillas J.
Gonzalez A.
6-27-5
Luz O.
Cid R.
2-66-36-1
Clezar G.
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Estrella V.
Arevalo M.
7-57-5
Alvarez N.
Arconada J.
6-36-0
Menezes J.
Sakamoto P.
6-27-63
Zeballos F.
Bertran P.
2-66-16-1
Hernandez J.
Chazal M.
6-16-3
Tabilo A.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-4
Hidalgo D.
Cachin P.
7-686-3
Olivo R.
Hardt N.
6-23-66-1
Moroni G.
Escobar G.
6-36-1