Alejandro Gonzalez vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Campinas CH Round of 64

Campinas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
COL
Alejandro Gonzalez
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 September 2019
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Gonzalez A.
7-5 7-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Gonzalez A.
772
Reis Da Silva J.
550

Alejandro Gonzalez defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 7-5 7-5 in the Campinas CH round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alejandro Gonzalez came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gonzalez A.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gonzalez A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gonzalez A.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gonzalez A.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
5
12
Break points saved·Dominant
22
49
Break points won·Dominant
12
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
23
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Varillas J.
Ficovich J.
2-67-646-2
Semi-finals
Varillas J.
Coria F.[5]
6-06-4
Ficovich J.
Nagal S.[6]
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Varillas J.
Hidalgo D.
6-16-2
Coria F.[5]
Bellucci T.[16]
6-47-61
Ficovich J.
Alvarez N.
6-16-3
Nagal S.[6]
Cerundolo F.[13]
7-627-5
R16
Bellucci T.[16]
Mayer L.[2]
W/O
Ficovich J.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-3
Coria F.[5]
Tabilo A.[11]
6-34-66-4
Hidalgo D.
Hamou M.
7-654-66-3
Varillas J.
Collarini A.[10]
7-656-2
Alvarez N.
Sakamoto P.
6-16-2
Nagal S.[6]
Luz O.
7-56-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Dellien H.[1]
6-46-1
R32
Sakamoto P.
Andreozzi G.[4]
6-44-0
Nagal S.[6]
Elias G.
4-1
Bellucci T.[16]
Lindell C.
7-640-0
Gonzalez A.
Hernandez J.[12]
7-646-776-3
Mayer L.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-616-4
Tabilo A.[11]
Villanueva G.
6-06-3
Coria F.[5]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-27-66
Hamou M.
Monteiro T.[3]
7-54-66-1
Hidalgo D.
Olivo R.[14]
7-626-2
Collarini A.[10]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-4
Varillas J.
Bagnis F.[7]
6-26-4
Ficovich J.
Mena F.[8]
6-46-1
Luz O.
Menezes J.[9]
6-46-4
Cerundolo F.[13]
Matos R.
6-26-3
Alvarez N.
Jahn J.[15]
6-46-2
Dellien H.[1]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
R64
Matos R.
Malla B.
7-55-73-1
Hidalgo D.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-44-0
Varillas J.
Gutierrez O.
6-26-2
Gonzalez A.
Reis Da Silva J.
7-57-5
Alvarez N.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Toledo Bague P.
6-46-0
Ficovich J.
Zukas M.
6-26-3
Hamou M.
Mejia N.
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Velotti A.
6-46-3
Lindell C.
Olivieri G.
7-647-5
Villanueva G.
Romboli F.
6-26-2
Meligeni Alves F.
Seyboth Wild T.
5-76-26-2
Etcheverry T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-4
Elias G.
Cuevas M.
7-56-2
Luz O.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-07-5
Clezar G.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-16-0