Sumit Nagal vs Pedro Sakamoto — Buenos Aires CH Round of 32

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND7
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Nagal S.
6-7 6-4 6-3
Sakamoto P.
Nagal S.
62662
Sakamoto P.
77431

Sumit Nagal defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
48
Break points won·Clear edge
35
22
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·Even
96
94

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-06-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Mayer L.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[13]
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-17-5
Mayer L.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-16-737-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Velotti A.
6-37-61
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Lindell C.
7-667-64
Mayer L.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-686-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Varillas J.
7-636-3
Nagal S.[7]
Hernandez J.[12]
6-33-66-4
Collarini A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Velotti A.
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
7-661-66-3
R32
Velotti A.
Delbonis F.[1]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Franco Descotte M.[15]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-726-46-3
Varillas J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-46-2
Hernandez J.[12]
Casanova H.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Tirante T.
6-16-2
Collarini A.[11]
Toledo Bague P.
6-47-5
Andreozzi G.[5]
Olivieri G.
7-672-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Coria F.[6]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Menezes J.[10]
2-67-57-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Olivo R.[14]
7-54-66-2
Mayer L.[3]
Zeballos F.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Mena F.[9]
7-606-2
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
Alvarez N.
6-46-4
R64
Velotti A.
Estevez M.
6-06-2
Ficovich J.
Luz O.
6-27-66
Casanova H.
Clezar G.
6-16-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Elias G.
6-43-0
Hamou M.
Etcheverry T.
6-37-611
Varillas J.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Baez S.
6-756-27-63
Toledo Bague P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
4-67-656-2
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-6106-4
Tirante T.
Matos R.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Burruchaga R.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
6-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Kestelboim M.
6-35-77-5
Zeballos F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Alvarez N.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-0