Miomir Kecmanovic vs Casper Ruud — Zhuhai Round of 32

Zhuhai · ATP · Round of 32
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
Miomir Kecmanovic
#50ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 23 September 2019
hard
Casper Ruud
NOR
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Kecmanovic M.
6-2 0-0
Ruud C.
Kecmanovic M.
60–
Ruud C.
20–

Miomir Kecmanovic advanced when Casper Ruud retired 6-2 0-0 in the Zhuhai round of 32. Miomir Kecmanovic narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Head to head

2–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-19Miami MastersR64hardCasper Ruud3-6 6-4 6-4
2024-05-06Rome MastersR64clayMiomir Kecmanovic0-6 6-4 6-4
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-4 6-1
2023-04-03EstorilFclayCasper Ruud6-2 7-6(3)
2019-11-05NextGen FinalsRRhardMiomir Kecmanovic4-3(5) 4-3(5) 4-2
2019-05-13Rome MastersQ2clayCasper Ruud6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kecmanovic M.Ruud C.
34
Serve
59
45
Return
31

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
91
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Slight edge
67
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Ruud C.
Freshness·Even
94
97

Kecmanovic M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ruud C.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
De Minaur A.[7]
Mannarino A.
7-646-4
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[7]
Bautista Agut R.[2]
6-26-2
Mannarino A.
Ramos A.[8]
6-04-66-1
Quarter-finals
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Seppi A.
6-26-2
Ramos A.[8]
Monfils G.[3]
7-56-4
Mannarino A.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-4
De Minaur A.[7]
Coric B.[4]
6-24-66-4
R16
Ramos A.[8]
Kecmanovic M.
7-626-3
Coric B.[4]
Wu D.
6-36-3
Dzumhur D.
Kwon S.
7-636-2
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Andujar P.
7-57-5
Mannarino A.
Tsitsipas S.[1]
3-67-50-0
Seppi A.
Zhang Z.
7-644-67-68
Monfils G.[3]
Norrie C.
5-76-36-4
De Minaur A.[7]
Murray A.
4-66-26-4
R32
Kecmanovic M.
Ruud C.
6-20-0
Zhang Z.
Koepfer D.
7-56-2
Ramos A.[8]
Nishioka Y.
6-26-1
Murray A.
Sandgren T.
6-36-766-1
Mannarino A.
Zhang Z.
7-667-5
Wu D.
Ito T.
3-66-37-5
Dzumhur D.
Cecchinato M.
5-76-46-2
Kwon S.
Pouille L.[5]
7-646-2
Andujar P.
Johnson S.
2-66-26-1
De Minaur A.[7]
Millman J.
6-16-3
Norrie C.
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-4
Seppi A.
Kyrgios N.[6]
7-656-1