Sumit Nagal vs Jose Hernandez — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND7
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
clay
DOM12
Jose Hernandez
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Nagal S.
6-3 3-6 6-4
Hernandez J.
Nagal S.
6362
Hernandez J.
3641

Sumit Nagal defeated Jose Hernandez 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Hernandez J.

Hernandez J.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Hernandez J.
1st serve in·Even
70%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Even
1.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Hernandez J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
24
Break points saved·Dominant
69
34
Break points won·Slight edge
35
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
38
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Hernandez J.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-06-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Mayer L.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[13]
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-17-5
Mayer L.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-16-737-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Velotti A.
6-37-61
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Lindell C.
7-667-64
Mayer L.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-686-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Varillas J.
7-636-3
Nagal S.[7]
Hernandez J.[12]
6-33-66-4
Collarini A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Velotti A.
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
7-661-66-3
R32
Velotti A.
Delbonis F.[1]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Franco Descotte M.[15]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-726-46-3
Varillas J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-46-2
Hernandez J.[12]
Casanova H.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Tirante T.
6-16-2
Collarini A.[11]
Toledo Bague P.
6-47-5
Andreozzi G.[5]
Olivieri G.
7-672-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Coria F.[6]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Menezes J.[10]
2-67-57-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Olivo R.[14]
7-54-66-2
Mayer L.[3]
Zeballos F.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Mena F.[9]
7-606-2
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
Alvarez N.
6-46-4
R64
Velotti A.
Estevez M.
6-06-2
Ficovich J.
Luz O.
6-27-66
Casanova H.
Clezar G.
6-16-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Elias G.
6-43-0
Hamou M.
Etcheverry T.
6-37-611
Varillas J.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Baez S.
6-756-27-63
Toledo Bague P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
4-67-656-2
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-6106-4
Tirante T.
Matos R.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Burruchaga R.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
6-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Kestelboim M.
6-35-77-5
Zeballos F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Alvarez N.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-0