Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Matias Zukas — Buenos Aires CH Round of 64

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
clay
ARG
Matias Zukas
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Ugo Carabelli C.
4-6 7-6 6-2
Zukas M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
47762
Zukas M.
66521

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Matias Zukas 4-6 7-6 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zukas M.

Zukas M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Serve advantage — Ugo Carabelli C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Zukas M.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Zukas M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Zukas M.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-06-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Mayer L.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[13]
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-17-5
Mayer L.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-16-737-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Velotti A.
6-37-61
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Lindell C.
7-667-64
Mayer L.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-686-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Varillas J.
7-636-3
Nagal S.[7]
Hernandez J.[12]
6-33-66-4
Collarini A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Velotti A.
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
7-661-66-3
R32
Velotti A.
Delbonis F.[1]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Franco Descotte M.[15]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-726-46-3
Varillas J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-46-2
Hernandez J.[12]
Casanova H.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Tirante T.
6-16-2
Collarini A.[11]
Toledo Bague P.
6-47-5
Andreozzi G.[5]
Olivieri G.
7-672-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Coria F.[6]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Menezes J.[10]
2-67-57-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Olivo R.[14]
7-54-66-2
Mayer L.[3]
Zeballos F.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Mena F.[9]
7-606-2
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
Alvarez N.
6-46-4
R64
Velotti A.
Estevez M.
6-06-2
Ficovich J.
Luz O.
6-27-66
Casanova H.
Clezar G.
6-16-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Elias G.
6-43-0
Hamou M.
Etcheverry T.
6-37-611
Varillas J.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Baez S.
6-756-27-63
Toledo Bague P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
4-67-656-2
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-6106-4
Tirante T.
Matos R.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Burruchaga R.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
6-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Kestelboim M.
6-35-77-5
Zeballos F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Alvarez N.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-0