Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
clay
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
Ficovich J.
7-5 6-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Ficovich J.
762
Ugo Carabelli C.
540

Juan Pablo Ficovich defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli 7-5 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ficovich J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Ugo Carabelli C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ficovich J.Ugo Carabelli C.
—
Serve
24
—
Return
28

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ficovich J.Ugo Carabelli C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ficovich J.Ugo Carabelli C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
78
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
90
Break points won·Dominant
9
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ficovich J.Ugo Carabelli C.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d) · Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-06-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Mayer L.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[13]
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-17-5
Mayer L.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-16-737-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Velotti A.
6-37-61
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Lindell C.
7-667-64
Mayer L.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-686-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Varillas J.
7-636-3
Nagal S.[7]
Hernandez J.[12]
6-33-66-4
Collarini A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Velotti A.
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
7-661-66-3
R32
Velotti A.
Delbonis F.[1]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Franco Descotte M.[15]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-726-46-3
Varillas J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-46-2
Hernandez J.[12]
Casanova H.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Tirante T.
6-16-2
Collarini A.[11]
Toledo Bague P.
6-47-5
Andreozzi G.[5]
Olivieri G.
7-672-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Coria F.[6]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Menezes J.[10]
2-67-57-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Olivo R.[14]
7-54-66-2
Mayer L.[3]
Zeballos F.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Mena F.[9]
7-606-2
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
Alvarez N.
6-46-4
R64
Velotti A.
Estevez M.
6-06-2
Ficovich J.
Luz O.
6-27-66
Casanova H.
Clezar G.
6-16-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Elias G.
6-43-0
Hamou M.
Etcheverry T.
6-37-611
Varillas J.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Baez S.
6-756-27-63
Toledo Bague P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
4-67-656-2
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-6106-4
Tirante T.
Matos R.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Burruchaga R.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
6-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Kestelboim M.
6-35-77-5
Zeballos F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Alvarez N.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-0