Darian King vs Ulises Blanch — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BAR7
Darian King
#1296ATP
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
King D.
2-6 7-6 7-5
Blanch U.
King D.
27772
Blanch U.
66251

Darian King defeated Ulises Blanch 2-6 7-6 7-5 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Darian King came in ranked #1296, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Darian King extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-21Winston-SalemQ1hardDarian King2-6 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
King D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs King D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
King D.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
King D.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
19
Break points saved·Dominant
37
83
Break points won·Dominant
34
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[1]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-56-736-4
Semi-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
2-66-26-1
Paul T.[1]
Gomez E.[4]
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Cressy M.[16]
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Nakashima B.
7-51-67-66
Gomez E.[4]
Bangoura S.
6-31-66-2
Paul T.[1]
Escobar G.
6-41-67-62
R16
Cressy M.[16]
Quiroz R.
5-76-26-3
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Couacaud E.[9]
7-56-1
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Giron M.[3]
4-67-636-4
Nakashima B.
Eubanks C.[10]
7-657-5
Bangoura S.
King D.[7]
1-66-46-0
Gomez E.[4]
Escobedo E.[15]
7-642-66-2
Escobar G.
Torpegaard M.[5]
6-47-69
Paul T.[1]
Gaston H.
7-686-1
R32
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Leshem E.
6-46-0
Escobedo E.[15]
Young D.
6-14-2
Escobar G.
Krueger M.[11]
7-676-3
Quiroz R.
Kudla D.[2]
6-36-2
Cressy M.[16]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Giron M.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-47-5
Eubanks C.[10]
Arevalo M.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.
Mmoh M.[6]
5-76-36-4
King D.[7]
Blanch U.
2-67-627-5
Bangoura S.
Polansky P.[12]
6-16-4
Gomez E.[4]
Pervolarakis M.
5-76-06-4
Torpegaard M.[5]
Peniston R.
4-66-46-3
Gaston H.
Galan D.[13]
3-66-36-4
Paul T.[1]
Holt B.
5-76-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-46-4
Couacaud E.[9]
Aragone J.
6-36-1
R64
Pervolarakis M.
Sinclair C.
6-37-60
Gomez Herrera C.
Fanselow S.
6-44-66-2
Aragone J.
Altamirano C.
6-27-63
Quiroz R.
Styler O.
3-66-46-4
Wolf J.
Sarkissian A.
6-737-636-4
Leshem E.
Crawford O.
6-736-46-4
Redlicki M.
Peliwo F.
6-35-76-3
Arevalo M.
Zhu E.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Nava E.
6-26-3
Bangoura S.
Geerts M.
6-47-5
Young D.
Shane R.
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Ritschard A.
6-06-4
Escobar G.
Smith R.
6-23-66-2
Gaston H.
Song E.
3-66-46-4
Holt B.
Sarmiento R.
6-46-766-3
Nakashima B.
Redlicki M.
6-36-3