Sumit Nagal vs Facundo Bagnis — Buenos Aires CH Final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Sumit Nagal
IND7
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2019
clay
ARG8
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Nagal S.
6-4 6-2
Bagnis F.
Nagal S.
662
Bagnis F.
420

Sumit Nagal defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-4 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
92
Break points won·Even
35
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Bagnis F.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Monteiro T.[4]
6-06-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Mayer L.[3]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Cerundolo F.[13]
6-34-66-4
Monteiro T.[4]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-17-5
Mayer L.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-16-737-65
Bagnis F.[8]
Velotti A.
6-37-61
R16
Monteiro T.[4]
Lindell C.
7-667-64
Mayer L.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-686-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Varillas J.
7-636-3
Nagal S.[7]
Hernandez J.[12]
6-33-66-4
Collarini A.[11]
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Velotti A.
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
7-661-66-3
R32
Velotti A.
Delbonis F.[1]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[13]
Hamou M.
6-26-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-46-2
Lindell C.
Franco Descotte M.[15]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-726-46-3
Varillas J.
Dellien H.[2]
6-46-2
Hernandez J.[12]
Casanova H.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Tirante T.
6-16-2
Collarini A.[11]
Toledo Bague P.
6-47-5
Andreozzi G.[5]
Olivieri G.
7-672-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Coria F.[6]
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Menezes J.[10]
2-67-57-5
Diaz Acosta F.
Olivo R.[14]
7-54-66-2
Mayer L.[3]
Zeballos F.
7-56-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Mena F.[9]
7-606-2
Seyboth Wild T.[16]
Alvarez N.
6-46-4
R64
Velotti A.
Estevez M.
6-06-2
Ficovich J.
Luz O.
6-27-66
Casanova H.
Clezar G.
6-16-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Elias G.
6-43-0
Hamou M.
Etcheverry T.
6-37-611
Varillas J.
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Sakamoto P.
Baez S.
6-756-27-63
Toledo Bague P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
6-26-0
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
4-67-656-2
Cuevas M.
Malla B.
7-6106-4
Tirante T.
Matos R.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Burruchaga R.
6-46-2
Olivieri G.
Gutierrez O.
6-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Kestelboim M.
6-35-77-5
Zeballos F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Alvarez N.
Cerundolo J.
6-36-0