Emil Ruusuvuori vs Jurij Rodionov — Glasgow CH Semi-final

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
FIN4
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2019
hard
Jurij Rodionov
AUT17
Jurij Rodionov
#143ATP
1636ELO
1584Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Ruusuvuori E.
6-1 6-3
Rodionov J.
Ruusuvuori E.
662
Rodionov J.
130

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Jurij Rodionov 6-1 6-3 in the Glasgow CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jurij Rodionov came in ranked #143.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Rodionov J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Rodionov J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Rodionov J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
89
Break points won·Dominant
48
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Rodionov J.
Freshness·
—
75

Rodionov J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Muller A.[16]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Rodionov J.[17]
6-16-3
Muller A.[16]
Ramanathan R.[5]
7-51-66-4
Quarter-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Kamke T.[9]
6-26-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Marcora R.[6]
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[5]
Masur D.[14]
7-57-64
Muller A.[16]
Kuhn N.[7]
3-67-56-4
R16
Masur D.[14]
Halys Q.[3]
7-657-64
Ramanathan R.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Bourgue M.[13]
6-46-746-3
Marcora R.[6]
Durasovic V.
7-656-2
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Ilkel C.[15]
6-36-2
Kuhn N.[7]
Basic M.[10]
6-36-4
Muller A.[16]
Jaziri M.[1]
6-36-1
Kamke T.[9]
Escoffier A.
6-26-2
R32
Halys Q.[3]
Rinderknech A.
7-660-0
Bourgue M.[13]
Klein L.
7-53-67-62
Jaziri M.[1]
Ocleppo J.
7-606-3
Escoffier A.
Bemelmans R.[8]
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[17]
Blancaneaux G.
2-66-46-4
Durasovic V.
Smith J.[12]
6-16-4
Marcora R.[6]
Johnson L.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Mridha J.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.[15]
Vanni L.
6-7106-26-0
Kamke T.[9]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ortega Olmedo R.[11]
6-06-0
Masur D.[14]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Kuhn N.[7]
Glasspool L.
3-66-46-3
Basic M.[10]
Drzewiecki K.
6-46-3
Muller A.[16]
Neuchrist M.
4-66-46-1
R64
Escoffier A.
Whitehouse M.
7-56-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Machac T.
6-46-3
Johnson L.
Verbeek S.
1-66-37-62
Vanni L.
Hassan B.
6-46-1
Durasovic V.
Robert Q.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Duncan S.
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Draper J.
6-756-46-2
Blancaneaux G.
Heliovaara H.
6-23-66-3
Klein L.
Martineau M.
7-626-2
Mridha J.
Wendelken H.
7-676-3
Furness E.
Bega A.
6-33-66-3
Rinderknech A.
Mchugh A.
7-6106-3
Glasspool L.
Balzerani R.
6-36-2
Drzewiecki K.
Grenier H.
6-35-76-2
Neuchrist M.
Hoyt E.
6-47-61