Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Roberto Ortega Olmedo — Glasgow CH Round of 32

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2019
hard
ESP11
Roberto Ortega Olmedo
35 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-0 6-0
Ortega Olmedo R.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Ortega Olmedo R.
000

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Roberto Ortega Olmedo 6-0 6-0 in the Glasgow CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Ortega Olmedo came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ortega Olmedo R.

Ortega Olmedo R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Ortega Olmedo R.
41
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Ortega Olmedo R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Ortega Olmedo R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
19
Break points won·Dominant
68
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Ortega Olmedo R.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Muller A.[16]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Rodionov J.[17]
6-16-3
Muller A.[16]
Ramanathan R.[5]
7-51-66-4
Quarter-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Kamke T.[9]
6-26-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Marcora R.[6]
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[5]
Masur D.[14]
7-57-64
Muller A.[16]
Kuhn N.[7]
3-67-56-4
R16
Masur D.[14]
Halys Q.[3]
7-657-64
Ramanathan R.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Bourgue M.[13]
6-46-746-3
Marcora R.[6]
Durasovic V.
7-656-2
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Ilkel C.[15]
6-36-2
Kuhn N.[7]
Basic M.[10]
6-36-4
Muller A.[16]
Jaziri M.[1]
6-36-1
Kamke T.[9]
Escoffier A.
6-26-2
R32
Halys Q.[3]
Rinderknech A.
7-660-0
Bourgue M.[13]
Klein L.
7-53-67-62
Jaziri M.[1]
Ocleppo J.
7-606-3
Escoffier A.
Bemelmans R.[8]
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[17]
Blancaneaux G.
2-66-46-4
Durasovic V.
Smith J.[12]
6-16-4
Marcora R.[6]
Johnson L.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Mridha J.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.[15]
Vanni L.
6-7106-26-0
Kamke T.[9]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ortega Olmedo R.[11]
6-06-0
Masur D.[14]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Kuhn N.[7]
Glasspool L.
3-66-46-3
Basic M.[10]
Drzewiecki K.
6-46-3
Muller A.[16]
Neuchrist M.
4-66-46-1
R64
Escoffier A.
Whitehouse M.
7-56-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Machac T.
6-46-3
Johnson L.
Verbeek S.
1-66-37-62
Vanni L.
Hassan B.
6-46-1
Durasovic V.
Robert Q.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Duncan S.
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Draper J.
6-756-46-2
Blancaneaux G.
Heliovaara H.
6-23-66-3
Klein L.
Martineau M.
7-626-2
Mridha J.
Wendelken H.
7-676-3
Furness E.
Bega A.
6-33-66-3
Rinderknech A.
Mchugh A.
7-6106-3
Glasspool L.
Balzerani R.
6-36-2
Drzewiecki K.
Grenier H.
6-35-76-2
Neuchrist M.
Hoyt E.
6-47-61