Maxime Chazal vs Yuta Shimizu — Biella CH Round of 64

Biella CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
FRA
Maxime Chazal
#469ATP
1294ELO
1262Clay ELO
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2019
clay
JPN
Yuta Shimizu
#371ATP
1446ELO
1309Clay ELO
27 yrs · 163 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLWWLWW
Chazal M.
6-3 6-3
Shimizu Y.
Chazal M.
662
Shimizu Y.
330

Maxime Chazal defeated Yuta Shimizu 6-3 6-3 in the Biella CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chazal M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Shimizu Y.

Shimizu Y.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chazal M.

Serve advantage — Shimizu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chazal M.Shimizu Y.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chazal M.Shimizu Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
2
24
Break points saved·Dominant
40
65
Break points won·Clear edge
22
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
12
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Chazal M.Shimizu Y.
Freshness·Even
73
75

Chazal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d) · Shimizu Y.: played today · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mager G.[8]
Lorenzi P.[4]
6-06-747-5
Semi-finals
Mager G.[8]
Munar J.[2]
6-46-2
Lorenzi P.[4]
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
6-34-67-5
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Daniel T.[5]
7-656-2
Mager G.[8]
Robredo T.[13]
6-16-746-1
Lorenzi P.[4]
Collarini A.
5-76-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Giannessi A.[7]
6-26-1
R16
Giannessi A.[7]
Trungelliti M.[12]
7-646-1
Mager G.[8]
Heller P.
6-47-63
Munar J.[2]
Napolitano S.[14]
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
6-746-46-2
Daniel T.[5]
Gaio F.[10]
7-643-66-3
Robredo T.[13]
Martin A.[3]
7-613-66-3
Lorenzi P.[4]
Berlocq C.[16]
6-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Benchetrit E.[15]
6-26-2
R32
Martin A.[3]
Esteve Lobato E.
7-646-3
Munar J.[2]
Moroni G.
7-56-2
Daniel T.[5]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-36-4
Napolitano S.[14]
Eriksson M.
6-46-4
Heller P.
Baldi F.[9]
3-66-47-5
Giannessi A.[7]
Dambrosi G.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-37-5
Trungelliti M.[12]
Casanova H.
5-76-36-4
Benchetrit E.[15]
Chazal M.
6-33-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Jahn J.
7-57-5
Gaio F.[10]
Galovic V.
6-46-4
Robredo T.[13]
Gutierrez O.
6-06-1
Mager G.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Giustino L.[6]
7-655-76-3
Vilella Martinez M.[11]
Brancaccio R.
6-16-4
Berlocq C.[16]
Bonadio R.
6-16-1
R64
Casanova H.
Lindell C.
6-17-68
Moroni G.
Pellegrino A.
6-14-1
Arnaboldi A.
Boluda Purkiss C.
7-52-0
Dambrosi G.
Rondoni P.
0-65-5
Jahn J.
Dalla Valle E.
6-36-4
Chazal M.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Collarini A.
Bellucci T.
6-36-3
Eriksson M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-47-63
Heller P.
Correia Passos Do Carmo J.
7-646-2
Munoz de la Nava D.
Ehrat S.
5-76-47-66
Galovic V.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-37-5
Gutierrez O.
Quinzi G.
6-21-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Romboli F.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-0
Bonadio R.
Cachin P.
4-66-36-2