Altug Celikbilek vs Jack Draper — Glasgow CH Round of 64

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2019
hard
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Celikbilek A.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Draper J.
Celikbilek A.
65662
Draper J.
77421

Altug Celikbilek defeated Jack Draper 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Glasgow CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
88
Break points saved·Dominant
73
99
Break points won·Dominant
38
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Celikbilek A.Draper J.
Freshness·
—
100

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Muller A.[16]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Rodionov J.[17]
6-16-3
Muller A.[16]
Ramanathan R.[5]
7-51-66-4
Quarter-finals
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Kamke T.[9]
6-26-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Marcora R.[6]
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[5]
Masur D.[14]
7-57-64
Muller A.[16]
Kuhn N.[7]
3-67-56-4
R16
Masur D.[14]
Halys Q.[3]
7-657-64
Ramanathan R.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-1
Rodionov J.[17]
Bourgue M.[13]
6-46-746-3
Marcora R.[6]
Durasovic V.
7-656-2
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Ilkel C.[15]
6-36-2
Kuhn N.[7]
Basic M.[10]
6-36-4
Muller A.[16]
Jaziri M.[1]
6-36-1
Kamke T.[9]
Escoffier A.
6-26-2
R32
Halys Q.[3]
Rinderknech A.
7-660-0
Bourgue M.[13]
Klein L.
7-53-67-62
Jaziri M.[1]
Ocleppo J.
7-606-3
Escoffier A.
Bemelmans R.[8]
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[17]
Blancaneaux G.
2-66-46-4
Durasovic V.
Smith J.[12]
6-16-4
Marcora R.[6]
Johnson L.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
Mridha J.
7-54-66-3
Ilkel C.[15]
Vanni L.
6-7106-26-0
Kamke T.[9]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ortega Olmedo R.[11]
6-06-0
Masur D.[14]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Kuhn N.[7]
Glasspool L.
3-66-46-3
Basic M.[10]
Drzewiecki K.
6-46-3
Muller A.[16]
Neuchrist M.
4-66-46-1
R64
Escoffier A.
Whitehouse M.
7-56-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Machac T.
6-46-3
Johnson L.
Verbeek S.
1-66-37-62
Vanni L.
Hassan B.
6-46-1
Durasovic V.
Robert Q.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Duncan S.
6-36-3
Celikbilek A.
Draper J.
6-756-46-2
Blancaneaux G.
Heliovaara H.
6-23-66-3
Klein L.
Martineau M.
7-626-2
Mridha J.
Wendelken H.
7-676-3
Furness E.
Bega A.
6-33-66-3
Rinderknech A.
Mchugh A.
7-6106-3
Glasspool L.
Balzerani R.
6-36-2
Drzewiecki K.
Grenier H.
6-35-76-2
Neuchrist M.
Hoyt E.
6-47-61