Tommy Paul vs Ryan Peniston — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA2
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Paul T.
6-4 7-6
Peniston R.
Paul T.
6772
Peniston R.
4630

Tommy Paul defeated Ryan Peniston 6-4 7-6 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #24.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Peniston R.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
20
Break points saved·Dominant
99
60
Break points won·Dominant
87
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Peniston R.
Freshness·
88
—

Paul T.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[1]
Mmoh M.[11]
6-26-746-3
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
4-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[11]
Aragone J.
4-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.
Blanch U.
6-767-652-2
Mmoh M.[11]
Paul T.[2]
2-67-666-1
Couacaud E.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Seppi A.[1]
Rubin N.[10]
6-06-4
R16
Paul T.[2]
Nakashima B.
7-606-4
Peliwo F.
Fratangelo B.[3]
W/O
Mmoh M.[11]
Torpegaard M.[6]
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Patael B.
6-16-4
Aragone J.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[5]
Young D.[12]
6-13-66-3
Rubin N.[10]
Eubanks C.[8]
6-46-737-65
Seppi A.[1]
Smith J.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Aragone J.
Polansky P.[9]
7-646-4
Patael B.
Giron M.[4]
2-67-50-0
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.[13]
7-646-4
Paul T.[2]
Peniston R.
6-47-63
Blanch U.
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[5]
King K.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Redlicki M.
6-46-796-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-17-5
Smith J.[16]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Young D.[12]
Olivo R.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[11]
Sarkissian A.
5-77-646-0
Nguyen D.
Krueger M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Peliwo F.
Galan D.[14]
1-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-46-3
Rubin N.[10]
Song E.
6-36-3
R64
Peliwo F.
Smith R.
5-4
Redlicki M.
Kumar O.
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Zhu E.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Ritschard A.
7-666-3
Nguyen D.
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Blanch U.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Babelis T.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Petit G.
6-36-2
Aragone J.
Farren C.
6-27-65
Caruana L.
Arconada J.
7-681-66-2
Broady L.
Chrysochos P.
6-36-0
Patael B.
Adams H.
7-56-4
King K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-42-66-2
Redlicki M.
Rybakov A.
6-46-2
Mejia N.
Bangoura S.
4-67-616-4