Sumit Nagal vs Matija Pecotic — Banja Luka CH Round of 16

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND6
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
CRO
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Nagal S.
6-1 6-1
Pecotic M.
Nagal S.
662
Pecotic M.
110

Sumit Nagal defeated Matija Pecotic 6-1 6-1 in the Banja Luka CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Pecotic M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Pecotic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Pecotic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
45
Break points won·Slight edge
35
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Pecotic M.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[7]
Nagal S.[6]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[7]
Krstin P.[10]
6-44-67-5
Nagal S.[6]
Horansky F.[5]
7-616-2
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[5]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-76-1
Nagal S.[6]
Coria F.[4]
6-27-5
Krstin P.[10]
Popko D.[13]
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[7]
Mena F.[16]
6-787-56-1
R16
Mena F.[16]
Moroni G.
6-46-3
Krstin P.[10]
Berlocq C.[8]
6-26-4
Tabilo A.[14]
Kolar Z.
6-05-76-1
Horansky F.[5]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Kalenichenko D.
7-616-0
Nagal S.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-16-1
Popko D.[13]
Miladinovic M.
7-653-66-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Clezar G.
6-46-3
R32
Collarini A.[11]
Denolly C.
5-0
Horansky F.[5]
Crepatte B.
6-16-2
Kalenichenko D.
Petrovic D.[15]
3-67-57-64
Berlocq C.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
7-617-65
Tabilo A.[14]
Sabanov M.
6-26-0
Kolar Z.
Baldi F.[2]
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Oconnell C.[12]
6-35-77-63
Nagal S.[6]
Nedelko I.
6-37-63
Popko D.[13]
Olivieri G.
6-26-1
Miladinovic M.
Milojevic N.[3]
6-26-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Reboul F.
7-54-66-3
Clezar G.
Dutra Silva R.[9]
6-36-1
Mena F.[16]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Moroni G.
Haase R.[1]
6-16-4
Coria F.[4]
Safranek V.
3-66-16-1
Krstin P.[10]
Balzerani R.
6-26-4
R64
Ugo Carabelli C.
Erler A.
6-43-66-3
Nedelko I.
Zukas M.
6-17-5
Crepatte B.
Zekic M.
4-61-1
Sabanov M.
Serdarusic N.
6-14-66-2
Denolly C.
Shimizu Y.
6-42-66-4
Safranek V.
Ficovich J.
6-31-66-3
Kalenichenko D.
Berrettini J.
6-36-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Balzerani R.
Geerts M.
7-656-1
Olivieri G.
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
Miladinovic M.
Etcheverry T.
6-25-77-65
Clezar G.
Sels J.
6-26-3
Moroni G.
Malesevic N.
6-36-0
Pecotic M.
Radanovic G.
6-06-3
Reboul F.
Pla Malfeito J.
7-626-3