Tristan Lamasine vs Holger Rune — Istanbul CH Round of 64

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1725Hard ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Lamasine T.
6-1 6-3
Rune H.
Lamasine T.
662
Rune H.
130

Tristan Lamasine defeated Holger Rune 6-1 6-3 in the Istanbul CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamasine T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Rune H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lamasine T.Rune H.
—
Serve
47
—
Return
58

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lamasine T.Rune H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamasine T.Rune H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
91
Break points saved·Dominant
38
99
Break points won·Dominant
17
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Humbert U.[1]
Istomin D.[5]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[1]
Kavcic B.[16]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Poljak D.
6-36-2
Humbert U.[1]
Bemelmans R.[10]
6-737-56-2
Istomin D.[5]
Nedovyesov A.[13]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.[16]
Kuhn N.[12]
6-36-0
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Miedler L.
1-66-16-3
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Hoyt E.
6-23-0
Humbert U.[1]
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Bemelmans R.[10]
Rosol L.[6]
6-46-3
Poljak D.
Viola M.[17]
6-746-46-4
Kuhn N.[12]
Ramanathan R.[8]
6-37-5
Kavcic B.[16]
Copil M.[3]
6-37-5
Istomin D.[5]
Marcora R.[9]
3-66-37-69
R32
Kavcic B.[16]
Jianu F.
6-786-32-1
Istomin D.[5]
Zverev M.
6-796-22-1
Grenier H.
Arends S.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.[12]
Cornea V.
6-26-4
Miedler L.
Clarke J.[11]
6-37-5
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Cengiz B.
6-16-4
Marcora R.[9]
Setkic A.
6-16-1
Viola M.[17]
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Bemelmans R.[10]
Jecan M.
6-27-5
Humbert U.[1]
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Hoyt E.
Elgin M.
6-47-5
Poljak D.
Safiullin R.[14]
6-43-66-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Janvier M.[7]
1-66-46-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-26-2
Copil M.[3]
Roumane R.
6-30-66-2
Rosol L.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-23-66-4
R64
Poljak D.
Golubev A.
6-47-5
Zverev M.
Neuchrist M.
5-2
Grenier H.
Rodionov J.
6-35-76-2
Hoyt E.
Mertens Y.
7-54-67-63
Cengiz B.
Carr S.
6-36-2
Gengel M.
Danilov S.
6-26-0
Setkic A.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-65
Lamasine T.
Rune H.
6-16-3
Ilhan M.
Turker M.
6-46-3
Cornea V.
Saplin K.
6-06-1
Jianu F.
Yilmaz B.
6-26-1
Roumane R.
Lazov A.
7-52-66-1
Jecan M.
Dzhanashia S.
6-26-0
Miedler L.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Yevseyev D.
7-646-2