Daniel Nguyen vs Mitchell Krueger — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA7
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Nguyen D.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Krueger M.
Nguyen D.
6362
Krueger M.
3631

Daniel Nguyen defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in defending last year's round of 32, but Daniel Nguyen had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 6 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Nguyen closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
16
Break points saved·Dominant
37
87
Break points won·Slight edge
22
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nguyen D.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[1]
Mmoh M.[11]
6-26-746-3
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
4-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[11]
Aragone J.
4-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.
Blanch U.
6-767-652-2
Mmoh M.[11]
Paul T.[2]
2-67-666-1
Couacaud E.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Seppi A.[1]
Rubin N.[10]
6-06-4
R16
Paul T.[2]
Nakashima B.
7-606-4
Peliwo F.
Fratangelo B.[3]
W/O
Mmoh M.[11]
Torpegaard M.[6]
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Patael B.
6-16-4
Aragone J.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[5]
Young D.[12]
6-13-66-3
Rubin N.[10]
Eubanks C.[8]
6-46-737-65
Seppi A.[1]
Smith J.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Aragone J.
Polansky P.[9]
7-646-4
Patael B.
Giron M.[4]
2-67-50-0
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.[13]
7-646-4
Paul T.[2]
Peniston R.
6-47-63
Blanch U.
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[5]
King K.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Redlicki M.
6-46-796-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-17-5
Smith J.[16]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Young D.[12]
Olivo R.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[11]
Sarkissian A.
5-77-646-0
Nguyen D.
Krueger M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Peliwo F.
Galan D.[14]
1-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-46-3
Rubin N.[10]
Song E.
6-36-3
R64
Peliwo F.
Smith R.
5-4
Redlicki M.
Kumar O.
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Zhu E.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Ritschard A.
7-666-3
Nguyen D.
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Blanch U.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Babelis T.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Petit G.
6-36-2
Aragone J.
Farren C.
6-27-65
Caruana L.
Arconada J.
7-681-66-2
Broady L.
Chrysochos P.
6-36-0
Patael B.
Adams H.
7-56-4
King K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-42-66-2
Redlicki M.
Rybakov A.
6-46-2
Mejia N.
Bangoura S.
4-67-616-4