Ugo Humbert vs Blaz Kavcic — Istanbul CH Semi-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Ugo Humbert
FRA1
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
SLO16
Blaz Kavcic
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Humbert U.
6-2 6-1
Kavcic B.
Humbert U.
662
Kavcic B.
210

Ugo Humbert defeated Blaz Kavcic 6-2 6-1 in the Istanbul CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kavcic B.

Kavcic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Kavcic B.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Kavcic B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Kavcic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
27
Break points saved·Dominant
99
43
Break points won·Even
37
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
32
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Kavcic B.
Freshness·
96
—

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Humbert U.[1]
Istomin D.[5]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[1]
Kavcic B.[16]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Poljak D.
6-36-2
Humbert U.[1]
Bemelmans R.[10]
6-737-56-2
Istomin D.[5]
Nedovyesov A.[13]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.[16]
Kuhn N.[12]
6-36-0
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Miedler L.
1-66-16-3
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Hoyt E.
6-23-0
Humbert U.[1]
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Bemelmans R.[10]
Rosol L.[6]
6-46-3
Poljak D.
Viola M.[17]
6-746-46-4
Kuhn N.[12]
Ramanathan R.[8]
6-37-5
Kavcic B.[16]
Copil M.[3]
6-37-5
Istomin D.[5]
Marcora R.[9]
3-66-37-69
R32
Kavcic B.[16]
Jianu F.
6-786-32-1
Istomin D.[5]
Zverev M.
6-796-22-1
Grenier H.
Arends S.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.[12]
Cornea V.
6-26-4
Miedler L.
Clarke J.[11]
6-37-5
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Cengiz B.
6-16-4
Marcora R.[9]
Setkic A.
6-16-1
Viola M.[17]
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Bemelmans R.[10]
Jecan M.
6-27-5
Humbert U.[1]
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Hoyt E.
Elgin M.
6-47-5
Poljak D.
Safiullin R.[14]
6-43-66-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Janvier M.[7]
1-66-46-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-26-2
Copil M.[3]
Roumane R.
6-30-66-2
Rosol L.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-23-66-4
R64
Poljak D.
Golubev A.
6-47-5
Zverev M.
Neuchrist M.
5-2
Grenier H.
Rodionov J.
6-35-76-2
Hoyt E.
Mertens Y.
7-54-67-63
Cengiz B.
Carr S.
6-36-2
Gengel M.
Danilov S.
6-26-0
Setkic A.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-65
Lamasine T.
Rune H.
6-16-3
Ilhan M.
Turker M.
6-46-3
Cornea V.
Saplin K.
6-06-1
Jianu F.
Yilmaz B.
6-26-1
Roumane R.
Lazov A.
7-52-66-1
Jecan M.
Dzhanashia S.
6-26-0
Miedler L.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Yevseyev D.
7-646-2