Ugo Humbert vs Denis Istomin — Istanbul CH Final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Ugo Humbert
FRA1
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
UZB5
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Humbert U.
6-2 6-2
Istomin D.
Humbert U.
662
Istomin D.
220

Ugo Humbert defeated Denis Istomin 6-2 6-2 in the Istanbul CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Istomin D.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Istomin D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Istomin D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
90
Break points won·Dominant
37
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Istomin D.
Freshness·
95
—

Humbert U.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Humbert U.[1]
Istomin D.[5]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[1]
Kavcic B.[16]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Poljak D.
6-36-2
Humbert U.[1]
Bemelmans R.[10]
6-737-56-2
Istomin D.[5]
Nedovyesov A.[13]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.[16]
Kuhn N.[12]
6-36-0
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Miedler L.
1-66-16-3
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Hoyt E.
6-23-0
Humbert U.[1]
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Bemelmans R.[10]
Rosol L.[6]
6-46-3
Poljak D.
Viola M.[17]
6-746-46-4
Kuhn N.[12]
Ramanathan R.[8]
6-37-5
Kavcic B.[16]
Copil M.[3]
6-37-5
Istomin D.[5]
Marcora R.[9]
3-66-37-69
R32
Kavcic B.[16]
Jianu F.
6-786-32-1
Istomin D.[5]
Zverev M.
6-796-22-1
Grenier H.
Arends S.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.[12]
Cornea V.
6-26-4
Miedler L.
Clarke J.[11]
6-37-5
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Cengiz B.
6-16-4
Marcora R.[9]
Setkic A.
6-16-1
Viola M.[17]
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Bemelmans R.[10]
Jecan M.
6-27-5
Humbert U.[1]
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Hoyt E.
Elgin M.
6-47-5
Poljak D.
Safiullin R.[14]
6-43-66-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Janvier M.[7]
1-66-46-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-26-2
Copil M.[3]
Roumane R.
6-30-66-2
Rosol L.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-23-66-4
R64
Poljak D.
Golubev A.
6-47-5
Zverev M.
Neuchrist M.
5-2
Grenier H.
Rodionov J.
6-35-76-2
Hoyt E.
Mertens Y.
7-54-67-63
Cengiz B.
Carr S.
6-36-2
Gengel M.
Danilov S.
6-26-0
Setkic A.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-65
Lamasine T.
Rune H.
6-16-3
Ilhan M.
Turker M.
6-46-3
Cornea V.
Saplin K.
6-06-1
Jianu F.
Yilmaz B.
6-26-1
Roumane R.
Lazov A.
7-52-66-1
Jecan M.
Dzhanashia S.
6-26-0
Miedler L.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Yevseyev D.
7-646-2